OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of third-generation oral contraceptives on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), homocysteine, and lipids levels in a population of young, fertile, nonobese women. METHODS: Blood markers were evaluated in 277 healthy white women (mean age 23 years and mean body-mass index 21 kg/m(2)). Seventy-seven oral contraceptive users were compared with 200 non-oral contraceptive users. Progressive cutoffs of high-sensitivity CRP and homocysteine levels were examined. RESULTS: Levels of high-sensitivity CRP posing a high risk of cardiovascular disease (3.0 to less than 10.0 mg/L) were found in 27.3% of oral contraceptive users and in 8.5% of non-oral contraceptive users (odds ratio 4.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99-8.18). Levels of high-sensitivity CRP at intermediate risk (1.0 to less than 3.0 mg/L) were found in 32.5% of oral contraceptive users and in 11.0% of non-oral contraceptive users (odds ratio 3.89; 95% CI 2.03-7.46). Notably, non-oral contraceptive users were 8.65 (95% CI 4.39-17.1) times as likely to demonstrate a protective level of high-sensitivity CRP (less than 0.5 mg/L) compared with oral contraceptive users. Oral contraceptive use increased serum triglycerides (P<.001) and total cholesterol P=.001); however, high-density lipoprotein, not low-density lipoprotein, contributed to this increase. A decreased ratio of low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed in oral contraceptive users compared with nonusers (P=.016). Oral contraceptive use did not affect homocysteine levels. CONCLUSION: Third-generation oral contraceptive use increases low-grade inflammatory status measured by high-sensitivity CRP concentrations. Alteration of inflammatory status in oral contraceptive users could affect the risk of venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, and other oral contraceptive-associated adverse conditions in young women.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of third-generation oral contraceptives on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), homocysteine, and lipids levels in a population of young, fertile, nonobese women. METHODS: Blood markers were evaluated in 277 healthy white women (mean age 23 years and mean body-mass index 21 kg/m(2)). Seventy-seven oral contraceptive users were compared with 200 non-oral contraceptive users. Progressive cutoffs of high-sensitivity CRP and homocysteine levels were examined. RESULTS: Levels of high-sensitivity CRP posing a high risk of cardiovascular disease (3.0 to less than 10.0 mg/L) were found in 27.3% of oral contraceptive users and in 8.5% of non-oral contraceptive users (odds ratio 4.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99-8.18). Levels of high-sensitivity CRP at intermediate risk (1.0 to less than 3.0 mg/L) were found in 32.5% of oral contraceptive users and in 11.0% of non-oral contraceptive users (odds ratio 3.89; 95% CI 2.03-7.46). Notably, non-oral contraceptive users were 8.65 (95% CI 4.39-17.1) times as likely to demonstrate a protective level of high-sensitivity CRP (less than 0.5 mg/L) compared with oral contraceptive users. Oral contraceptive use increased serum triglycerides (P<.001) and total cholesterol P=.001); however, high-density lipoprotein, not low-density lipoprotein, contributed to this increase. A decreased ratio of low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed in oral contraceptive users compared with nonusers (P=.016). Oral contraceptive use did not affect homocysteine levels. CONCLUSION: Third-generation oral contraceptive use increases low-grade inflammatory status measured by high-sensitivity CRP concentrations. Alteration of inflammatory status in oral contraceptive users could affect the risk of venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, and other oral contraceptive-associated adverse conditions in young women.
Authors: Lauren C Peres; Adrianne R Mallen; Mary K Townsend; Elizabeth M Poole; Britton Trabert; Naomi E Allen; Alan A Arslan; Laure Dossus; Renée T Fortner; Inger T Gram; Patricia Hartge; Annika Idahl; Rudolf Kaaks; Marina Kvaskoff; Anthony M Magliocco; Melissa A Merritt; J Ramón Quirós; Anne Tjonneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Rosario Tumino; Carla H van Gils; Kala Visvanathan; Nicolas Wentzensen; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Cecilia M Shikuma; Heather J Ribaudo; Yu Zheng; Roy M Gulick; William A Meyer; Karen T Tashima; Barbara Bastow; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Marshall J Glesby Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Elizabeth E Hatch; Kristen A Hahn; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Anders H Riis; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Chi Le-Ha; Lawrence J Beilin; Sally Burrows; Wendy H Oddy; Beth Hands; Trevor A Mori Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 5.922