PURPOSE: Early clinical studies with gefitinib showed promising efficacy and mild toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, gefitinib was an ideal agent to evaluate in a maintenance setting in stage III disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated patients with stage III NSCLC, a performance score of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were eligible. All patients received cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus etoposide 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5, every 28 days for two cycles with concurrent thoracic radiation (1.8- to 2-Gy fractions per day; total dose, 61 Gy) followed by three cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Patients whose disease did not progress were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg/d or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or the end of 5 years. The planned sample size was 672 patients to confer power of 0.89 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival time of 21 months (one-sided P = .025, log-rank test). Random assignment was stratified by stage, histology, and measurable versus nonmeasurable disease. RESULTS: Enrollment began in July 2001. An unplanned interim analysis conducted in April 2005 rejected the alternative hypothesis of improved survival at the P = .0015 level for 243 randomly assigned patients. The study closed, and preliminary results were reported. Now, with a median follow-up time of 27 months, median survival time was 23 months for gefitinib (n = 118) and 35 months for placebo (n = 125; two-sided P = .013). The toxic death rate was 2% with gefitinib compared with 0% for placebo. CONCLUSION: In this unselected population, gefitinib did not improve survival. Decreased survival was a result of tumor progression and not gefitinib toxicity.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Early clinical studies with gefitinib showed promising efficacy and mild toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, gefitinib was an ideal agent to evaluate in a maintenance setting in stage III disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated patients with stage III NSCLC, a performance score of 0 to 1, and adequate organ function were eligible. All patients received cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus etoposide 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5, every 28 days for two cycles with concurrent thoracic radiation (1.8- to 2-Gy fractions per day; total dose, 61 Gy) followed by three cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Patients whose disease did not progress were randomly assigned to gefitinib 250 mg/d or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or the end of 5 years. The planned sample size was 672 patients to confer power of 0.89 to detect a 33% increase over the expected median survival time of 21 months (one-sided P = .025, log-rank test). Random assignment was stratified by stage, histology, and measurable versus nonmeasurable disease. RESULTS: Enrollment began in July 2001. An unplanned interim analysis conducted in April 2005 rejected the alternative hypothesis of improved survival at the P = .0015 level for 243 randomly assigned patients. The study closed, and preliminary results were reported. Now, with a median follow-up time of 27 months, median survival time was 23 months for gefitinib (n = 118) and 35 months for placebo (n = 125; two-sided P = .013). The toxic death rate was 2% with gefitinib compared with 0% for placebo. CONCLUSION: In this unselected population, gefitinib did not improve survival. Decreased survival was a result of tumor progression and not gefitinibtoxicity.
Authors: Raymond H Mak; Elizabeth Doran; Alona Muzikansky; Josephine Kang; Joel W Neal; Elizabeth H Baldini; Noah C Choi; Henning Willers; David M Jackman; Lecia V Sequist Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-05-31
Authors: Geoffrey R Oxnard; Yelena Y Janjigian; Maria E Arcila; Camelia S Sima; Samantha L Kass; Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Christopher G Azzoli; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher D Willey; Ashley N Gilbert; Joshua C Anderson; George Yancey Gillespie Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Elizabeth A Hopper-Borge; Rochelle E Nasto; Vladimir Ratushny; Louis M Weiner; Erica A Golemis; Igor Astsaturov Journal: Expert Opin Ther Targets Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 6.902
Authors: Matthew J Bott; Aalok P Patel; Traves D Crabtree; Daniel Morgensztern; Clifford G Robinson; Graham A Colditz; Saiama Waqar; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnicka; G Alexander Patterson; Stephen Broderick; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 4.330