OBJECTIVES: Neural networks supporting encoding of new information are affected early in the course of Alzheimer disease (AD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in AD have reported decreased medial temporal lobe (MTL) activation when comparing novel versus repeated stimuli. It is, however, unclear whether this finding is related to a failure of normal suppression of MTL activity to repeated stimuli in AD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-nine healthy older subjects comprising a comparison group (OC) and 15 mild AD patients underwent fMRI during an associative memory paradigm in an academic medical center. The task consisted of blocks of Novel and Repeated face-name pairs and visual Fixation. To reveal neural correlates of processing repeatedly presented stimuli, Repeated blocks were contrasted to Fixation. RESULTS: AD patients demonstrated greater activation during Repeated stimuli in the MTL and in prefrontal and superior parietal cortices, compared with OC. In contrast, OC showed greater parietal task-induced deactivation than AD. Increased MTL activity during Repeated was correlated with more impaired parietal deactivation and poorer performance of the postscan recognition memory test of encoding the face-name pairs. CONCLUSION: Reduction of MTL activity to repeated stimuli, which become highly familiarized to healthy OC, was impaired in AD. This abnormal increased MTL activation was related to disrupted parietal deactivation and to poor recognition memory performance. These preliminary results suggest that the typical episodic memory impairment seen in mild AD may manifest as a failure of normal repetition suppression and loss of "beneficial" deactivation in the MTL-parietal memory networks.
OBJECTIVES: Neural networks supporting encoding of new information are affected early in the course of Alzheimer disease (AD). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in AD have reported decreased medial temporal lobe (MTL) activation when comparing novel versus repeated stimuli. It is, however, unclear whether this finding is related to a failure of normal suppression of MTL activity to repeated stimuli in AD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-nine healthy older subjects comprising a comparison group (OC) and 15 mild ADpatients underwent fMRI during an associative memory paradigm in an academic medical center. The task consisted of blocks of Novel and Repeated face-name pairs and visual Fixation. To reveal neural correlates of processing repeatedly presented stimuli, Repeated blocks were contrasted to Fixation. RESULTS:ADpatients demonstrated greater activation during Repeated stimuli in the MTL and in prefrontal and superior parietal cortices, compared with OC. In contrast, OC showed greater parietal task-induced deactivation than AD. Increased MTL activity during Repeated was correlated with more impaired parietal deactivation and poorer performance of the postscan recognition memory test of encoding the face-name pairs. CONCLUSION: Reduction of MTL activity to repeated stimuli, which become highly familiarized to healthy OC, was impaired in AD. This abnormal increased MTL activation was related to disrupted parietal deactivation and to poor recognition memory performance. These preliminary results suggest that the typical episodic memory impairment seen in mild AD may manifest as a failure of normal repetition suppression and loss of "beneficial" deactivation in the MTL-parietal memory networks.
Authors: K Herholz; E Salmon; D Perani; J C Baron; V Holthoff; L Frölich; P Schönknecht; K Ito; R Mielke; E Kalbe; G Zündorf; X Delbeuck; O Pelati; D Anchisi; F Fazio; N Kerrouche; B Desgranges; F Eustache; B Beuthien-Baumann; C Menzel; J Schröder; T Kato; Y Arahata; M Henze; W D Heiss Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: R A Sperling; J F Bates; E F Chua; A J Cocchiarella; D M Rentz; B R Rosen; D L Schacter; M S Albert Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Anne Hämäläinen; Maija Pihlajamäki; Heikki Tanila; Tuomo Hänninen; Eini Niskanen; Susanna Tervo; Pasi A Karjalainen; Ritva L Vanninen; Hilkka Soininen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: S A Rombouts; F Barkhof; D J Veltman; W C Machielsen; M P Witter; M A Bierlaagh; R H Lazeron; J Valk; P Scheltens Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Patrizia Vannini; Trey Hedden; Willem Huijbers; Andrew Ward; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Liang Wang; Peter Laviolette; Kelly O'Keefe; Deepti Putcha; Akram Bakkour; Koene R A Van Dijk; Maija Pihlajamäki; Bradford C Dickerson; Reisa A Sperling Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jeffrey N Browndyke; Kelly Giovanello; Jeffrey Petrella; Kathleen Hayden; Ornit Chiba-Falek; Karen A Tucker; James R Burke; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Adam S Fleisher; Ayesha Sherzai; Curtis Taylor; Jessica B S Langbaum; Kewei Chen; Richard B Buxton Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 6.556