Literature DB >> 18378526

Radiotherapy treatment delays and their influence on tumour control achieved by various fractionation schedules.

R M Wyatt1, B J Jones, R G Dale.   

Abstract

There is often a considerable delay from initial tumour diagnosis to the start of radiotherapy treatment. This paper extends the calculations of a previous paper on the effects of delays before the initiation of radiotherapy treatment to include results from a variety of practical fractionation regimes for three different types of tumour: squamous cell carcinoma (head and neck), breast and prostate. The linear quadratic model of radiation effect, logarithmic tumour growth (coupled with delay times where relevant) and the Poisson model for tumour control probability (TCP) are used to calculate the change in TCP for delays between diagnosis and treatment. Within the limitations of radiobiological modelling, these data can be used to tentatively assess the interactions between delays, dose fractionation and TCP. The results show that delays in the start of radiotherapy treatment do have an adverse effect on tumour control for fast-growing tumours. For example, calculations predict a reduction in local tumour control of up to 1.5% per week's delay for head and neck cancers treated following surgery. In addition, there may be a variety of fractionation regimes that will yield very similar clinical results for each tumour type. It is shown theoretically that, for the tumour types considered here, it is possible to increase the dose per fraction and decrease the number of fractions while maintaining or increasing TCP relative to standard 2 Gy fractionation regimes, although there may be some advantage to using hyperfractionated regimes for head and neck cancers in order to reduce normal tissue effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378526     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/94471640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Optimal sequence of implied modalities in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer treatment: an update on issues to consider.

Authors:  Pelagia G Tsoutsou; Yazid Belkacemi; Joseph Gligorov; Abraham Kuten; Hamouda Boussen; Nuran Bese; Michael I Koukourakis
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Three-Fraction Intracavitary Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy: Early Provider and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Novel Regimen.

Authors:  Krishan R Jethwa; Sean S Park; Karthik Gonuguntla; Stephanie M Wick; Laura A Vallow; Christopher L Deufel; Thomas J Whitaker; Keith M Furutani; Kathryn J Ruddy; Kimberly S Corbin; Tina J Hieken; Robert W Mutter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Improving efficacy and efficiency through the implementation of a new organisational model in a Radiation Oncology Department.

Authors:  Y Lupiañez-Perez; J Gomez-Millan; M Lobato; P Pedrosa; I Lupiañez-Perez; J A Medina
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Radiobiological characterization of post-lumpectomy focal brachytherapy with lipid nanoparticle-carried radionuclides.

Authors:  Brian A Hrycushko; Alonso N Gutierrez; Beth Goins; Weiqiang Yan; William T Phillips; Pamela M Otto; Ande Bao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Implementation of Telehealth in Radiation Oncology: Rapid Integration During COVID-19 and Its Future Role in Our Practice.

Authors:  Anuj Goenka; Daniel Ma; Sewit Teckie; Catherine Alfano; Beatrice Bloom; Jamie Hwang; Louis Potters
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-09

6.  Waiting time for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of local relapse and distant metastases in 615 patients.

Authors:  Raffaella Caponio; Maria Paola Ciliberti; Giusi Graziano; Rocco Necchia; Giovanni Scognamillo; Antonio Pascali; Sabino Bonaduce; Anna Milella; Gabriele Matichecchia; Cristian Cristofaro; Davide Di Fatta; Pasquale Tamborra; Marco Lioce
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Awareness and surveillance of radiation treatment schedules reduces head and neck overall treatment time.

Authors:  Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen; Janne Gornitzka; Pia Andersen; Morten Nielsen; Lars Johnsen; Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen; Ruta Zukauskaite; Jørgen Johansen; Christian Rønn Hansen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-02-23

8.  Effect of Waiting Time from Pathological Diagnosis to Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer on Overall Survival.

Authors:  Kyoung Won Noh; Bomi Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Won Kyung Cho; Won Park; Yoo-Young Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Survival impact of delaying postoperative chemoradiotherapy in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Maochen Zhang; Fei Xu; Weiqiong Ni; Weixiang Qi; Weiguo Cao; Cheng Xu; Jiayi Chen; Yunsheng Gao
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.