BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute pouchitis (AP) and chronic pouchitis (CP) are common after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to assess associations of preoperative perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) and anti-CBir1 flagellin on AP or CP development. METHODS: Patients were assessed prospectively for clinically and endoscopically proven AP (antibiotic responsive) or CP (antibiotic-dependent or refractory to antibiotic therapy). Sera from 238 patients were analyzed for ANCA and anti-CBir1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. pANCA(+) patients were substratified into high-level (>100 EU/mL) and low-level (<100 EU/mL) groups. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 47 months, 72 patients (30%) developed pouchitis. Pouchitis developed in 36% of pANCA(+) patients versus 16% of pANCA(-) patients (P = .005), 46% of anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 26% of anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .02), and 54% of 35 pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 31% of 136 pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .02). AP developed in 37 pANCA(+) patients (22%) versus 6 pANCA(-) patients (9%) (P = .02), and 12 anti-CBir1(+) patients (26%) versus 31 anti-CBir1(-) patients (16%) (P = .1). Although AP was not influenced by pANCA level, AP was seen in 38% of low-level pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 18% low-level pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .03). CP was seen in 29% of high-level pANCA(+) patients versus 11% of low-level pANCA(+) patients (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Both pANCA and anti-CBir1 expression are associated with pouchitis after IPAA. Anti-CBir1 increases the incidence of AP only in patients who have low-level pANCA expression, and increases the incidence of CP only in patients who have high-level pANCA expression. Diverse patterns of reactivity to microbial antigens may manifest as different forms of pouchitis after IPAA.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute pouchitis (AP) and chronic pouchitis (CP) are common after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to assess associations of preoperative perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) and anti-CBir1 flagellin on AP or CP development. METHODS:Patients were assessed prospectively for clinically and endoscopically proven AP (antibiotic responsive) or CP (antibiotic-dependent or refractory to antibiotic therapy). Sera from 238 patients were analyzed for ANCA and anti-CBir1 using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. pANCA(+) patients were substratified into high-level (>100 EU/mL) and low-level (<100 EU/mL) groups. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 47 months, 72 patients (30%) developed pouchitis. Pouchitis developed in 36% of pANCA(+) patients versus 16% of pANCA(-) patients (P = .005), 46% of anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 26% of anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .02), and 54% of 35 pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 31% of 136 pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .02). AP developed in 37 pANCA(+) patients (22%) versus 6 pANCA(-) patients (9%) (P = .02), and 12 anti-CBir1(+) patients (26%) versus 31 anti-CBir1(-) patients (16%) (P = .1). Although AP was not influenced by pANCA level, AP was seen in 38% of low-level pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(+) patients versus 18% low-level pANCA(+)/anti-CBir1(-) patients (P = .03). CP was seen in 29% of high-level pANCA(+) patients versus 11% of low-level pANCA(+) patients (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Both pANCA and anti-CBir1 expression are associated with pouchitis after IPAA. Anti-CBir1 increases the incidence of AP only in patients who have low-level pANCA expression, and increases the incidence of CP only in patients who have high-level pANCA expression. Diverse patterns of reactivity to microbial antigens may manifest as different forms of pouchitis after IPAA.
Authors: M Eggena; O Cohavy; M H Parseghian; B A Hamkalo; D Clemens; S R Targan; L K Gordon; J Braun Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 7.094
Authors: William G Rudolph; Sonja M S Uthoff; Tracy L McAuliffe; Elizabeth T Goode; Robert E Petras; Susan Galandiuk Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: N A Shepherd; L Hultén; G N Tytgat; R J Nicholls; D G Nasmyth; M J Hill; F Fernandez; D J Gertner; D S Rampton; M J Hill Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 1989-12 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: B Shen; J P Achkar; B A Lashner; A H Ormsby; F H Remzi; A Brzezinski; C L Bevins; M L Bambrick; D L Seidner; V W Fazio Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: K O Laake; A Bjørneklett; G Aamodt; L Aabakken; M Jacobsen; A Bakka; M H Vatn Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.423
Authors: Stephan R Targan; Carol J Landers; Huiying Yang; Michael J Lodes; Yingzi Cong; Konstantinos A Papadakis; Eric Vasiliauskas; Charles O Elson; Robert M Hershberg Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Orlaith B Kelly; Morgan Rosenberg; Andrea D Tyler; Joanne M Stempak; A Hillary Steinhart; Zane Cohen; Gordon R Greenberg; Mark S Silverberg Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Márta Kovács; Katalin Eszter Müller; Mária Papp; Péter László Lakatos; Mihály Csöndes; Gábor Veres Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Brindusa Truta; Dan X Li; Uma Mahadevan; Elena R Fisher; Yunn-Y Chen; Kim Grace; Fernando Velayos; Jonathan P Terdiman Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 3.199