Literature DB >> 18378454

Functional units of the human foot.

P Wolf1, A Stacoff, A Liu, C Nester, A Arndt, A Lundberg, E Stuessi.   

Abstract

Functional units in the human foot provide a meaningful basis for subdivisions of the entire foot during gait analysis as well as justified simplifications of foot models. The present study aimed to identify such functional units during walking and slow running. An invasive method based upon reflective marker arrays mounted on intracortical pins was used to register motion of seven foot bones. Six healthy subjects were assessed during walking and four of them during slow running. Angle-angle diagrams of corresponding planar bone rotations were plotted against each other and used to establish functional units. Individual functional units were accepted when the joints rotated temporally in phase and either (i) in the same direction, (ii) in the opposite direction, or (iii) when one of the two joints showed no rotation. A functional unit was generalized if all available angle-angle diagrams showed a consistent pattern. A medial array from the navicular to the first metatarsal was found to perform as a functional unit with parts rotating in the same direction and larger rotations occurring proximally. A rigid functional unit comprised the navicular and cuboid. No other functional units were identified. It was concluded that the talus, navicular, and medial cuneiform should neither be regarded as one rigid unit nor as one segment during gait analysis. The first and fifth metatarsals should also be considered separately. It was further concluded that a marker setup for gait analysis should consist of the following four segments: calcaneus, navicular-cuboid, medial cuneiform-first metatarsal, fifth metatarsal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378454     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  10 in total

1.  Kinematics of primate midfoot flexibility.

Authors:  Thomas M Greiner; Kevin A Ball
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over-ground and treadmill conditions.

Authors:  Christian J Barton; Simon L Kappel; Peter Ahrendt; Ole Simonsen; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  The Glasgow-Maastricht foot model, evaluation of a 26 segment kinematic model of the foot.

Authors:  Michiel Oosterwaal; Sylvain Carbes; Scott Telfer; James Woodburn; Søren Tørholm; Amir A Al-Munajjed; Lodewijk van Rhijn; Kenneth Meijer
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Reliability and correlates of cross-sectional area of abductor hallucis and the medial belly of the flexor hallucis brevis measured by ultrasound.

Authors:  Penelope J Latey; Joshua Burns; Elizabeth J Nightingale; Jillian L Clarke; Claire E Hiller
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation are representative surrogate measures of foot function in asymptomatic adults during walking.

Authors:  Patric Eichelberger; Johannes Pohl; Theo Jaspers; Matteo Ferraro; Fabian Krause; Heiner Baur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the canine carpal bones imaged with computed tomography after ex vivo axial limb loading and palmar ligament transection.

Authors:  Jack D Neville-Towle; Christopher J Tan; William C H Parr; William R Walsh; Kenneth A Johnson
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.495

7.  Effect of Long-Distance Running on Inter-segment Foot Kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jialin Li; Yang Song; Rongrong Xuan; Dong Sun; Ee-Chon Teo; István Bíró; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-04

8.  Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Bill Vicenzino; Mark W Cornwall; Natalie Collins; Meghan Warren
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Reliability and concurrent validity of a novel method allowing for in-shoe measurement of navicular drop.

Authors:  Birgitte H Christensen; Kathrine S Andersen; Kristina S Pedersen; Britt S Bengtsen; Ole Simonsen; Simon L Kappel; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Coordination among the rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot during walking.

Authors:  Tomoya Takabayashi; Mutsuaki Edama; Emi Nakamura; Erika Yokoyama; Chiaki Kanaya; Masayoshi Kubo
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.303

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.