Literature DB >> 18378345

Evaluation of different nucleic acid amplification techniques for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

K Loens1, T Beck, D Ursi, M Overdijk, P Sillekens, H Goossens, M Ieven.   

Abstract

The number of pathogens involved in community-acquired pneumonia, with varying susceptibilities to antimicrobials, is numerous constituting an enormous challenge for diagnostic microbiology. Differentiation of infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae and those due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, or L. pneumophila as well as those due to viruses is essential to allow correct decisions concerning the antibiotics to be administered. The sensitivity and specificity of real-time simplex and multiplex nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), and simplex PCR were compared for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from hospitalized and outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two hundred fifty one respiratory specimens were collected from 147 patients with CAP. NASBA was done using the NucliSens Basic Kit (bioMérieux). PCR for M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae was done as described earlier [Ieven, M., Ursi, D., Van Bever, H., Quint, W., Niesters, H. G. M., and Goossens, H. 1996. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and role of M. pneumoniae in acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. J. Infect. Dis. 173, 1445-14452.; Ursi, D., Ieven, M., Van Bever, H. P., and Goossens, H. 1998. Construction of an internal control for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae by PCR. Mol. Cellul. Probes. 12, 235-238.]. A real-time PCR was developed to detect L. pneumophila whereas a real-time NASBA was designed to detect Legionella spp. All samples with discordant results were re-analysed. Compared to an expanded gold standard the sensitivities of the different techniques, were 77.8%, 100%, and 100% for detection of M. pneumoniae; and 50%, 100%, and 50% for detection of L. pneumophila by PCR, real-time simplex NASBA, and real-time multiplex NASBA, respectively. C. pneumoniae was detected in two samples only. Simplex real-time NASBA proved to be more sensitive than simplex PCR and was also more sensitive than real-time multiplex NASBA, as previously found with spiked clinical specimens. It's practical attractiveness pleads for further optimalisation of the multiplex approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378345     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  K Loens; L Van Heirstraeten; S Malhotra-Kumar; H Goossens; M Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the combination of the NucliSENS easyMAG and the EasyQ applications for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae in respiratory tract specimens.

Authors:  E Béssède; H Renaudin; M Clerc; B de Barbeyrac; C Bébéar; S Pereyre
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Molecular methods for the detection of Mycoplasma and ureaplasma infections in humans: a paper from the 2011 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Ken B Waites; Li Xiao; Vanya Paralanov; Rose M Viscardi; John I Glass
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Performance of different mono- and multiplex nucleic acid amplification tests on a multipathogen external quality assessment panel.

Authors:  K Loens; A M van Loon; F Coenjaerts; Y van Aarle; H Goossens; P Wallace; E J C Claas; M Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of PCR Alone and Compared to Urinary Antigen Testing for Detection of Legionella spp.: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tomer Avni; Amir Bieber; Hefziba Green; Tali Steinmetz; Leonard Leibovici; Mical Paul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for molecular diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila.

Authors:  Min-Chul Cho; Hyewon Kim; Dongheui An; Miyoung Lee; Shin-Ae Noh; Mi-Na Kim; Young Pil Chong; Jun Hee Woo
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Comparative evaluation of six commercialized multiplex PCR kits for the diagnosis of respiratory infections.

Authors:  Sylvie Pillet; Marina Lardeux; Julia Dina; Florence Grattard; Paul Verhoeven; Jérôme Le Goff; Astrid Vabret; Bruno Pozzetto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Development of a DNA microarray assay for rapid detection of fifteen bacterial pathogens in pneumonia.

Authors:  Xiuqing Ma; Yanqin Li; Yuan Liang; Yang Liu; Ling Yu; Chunsun Li; Qiqi Liu; Liangan Chen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Observational Research in Childhood Infectious Diseases (ORChID): a dynamic birth cohort study.

Authors:  Stephen Bernard Lambert; Robert S Ware; Anne L Cook; Frances A Maguire; David M Whiley; Seweryn Bialasiewicz; Ian M Mackay; David Wang; Theo P Sloots; Michael D Nissen; Keith Grimwood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Comparison of serological methods with PCR-based methods for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical bacteria.

Authors:  Mariana Herrera; Yudy Alexandra Aguilar; Zulma Vanessa Rueda; Carlos Muskus; Lázaro Agustín Vélez
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.