Literature DB >> 18378136

Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874).

N S Reed1, C Mangioni, H Malmström, G Scarfone, A Poveda, S Pecorelli, S Tateo, M Franchi, J J Jobsen, C Coens, I Teodorovic, I Vergote, J B Vermorken.   

Abstract

The management of uterine sarcomas continues to present many difficulties. Primary surgery is the optimal treatment but the role of post-operative radiation remains uncertain. In the mid-1980s, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study proposed a trial to evaluate adjuvant radiotherapy, as previous non-randomised studies had suggested a survival advantage and improved local control when post-operative radiation was administered. The study opened in 1987 taking 13 years to accrue 224 patients. All uterine sarcoma subtypes were permitted. Patients were required to have undergone as a minimum, TAH and BSO and wahsings (166 patients) but nodal sampling was optional. There were 103 leiomyosarcomas (LMS), 91 carcinosarcomas (CS) and 28 endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS). Patients were randomised to either observation or pelvic radiation, 51 Gy in 28 fractions over 5 weeks. Hundred and twelve were recruited to each arm. The initial analysis has shown a reduction in local relapse (14 versus 24, p=0.004) but no effect on either OS or PFS. No unexpected toxicity was seen in the radiation arm. No difference in either overall or disease-free survival was demonstrated but there is an increased local control for the CS patients receiving radiation but without any benefit for LMS. Prognostic factor analysis shows that stage, age and histological subtype were important predictors of behaviour which may explain differences between CS and LMS. CS appears to show more kinship to poorly differentiated endometrial carcinomas in behaviour. LMS did not show the same benefit from radiation. These results will help shape future management and clinical trials in uterine sarcomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378136     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  110 in total

1.  A nomogram to predict postresection 5-year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Oliver Zivanovic; Lindsay M Jacks; Alexia Iasonos; Mario M Leitao; Robert A Soslow; Emanuela Veras; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Murray F Brennan; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  A review of treatment of uterine leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Renal leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Pastora Beardo; Maria José Ledo; Ruiz Campos Jose Luis
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2013-09-04

4.  Patterns of care, predictors, and outcomes of chemotherapy in elderly women with early-stage uterine carcinosarcoma: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Gunjal Garg; Cecilia Yee; Kendra Schwartz; David G Mutch; Robert T Morris; Matthew A Powell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  External validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in women with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Emily Z Keung; Oliver Zivanovic; Rosanna Mancari; Michele Peiretti; Marisa Nucci; Suzanne George; Nicoletta Colombo; Silvestro Carinelli; Martee L Hensley; Chandrajit P Raut
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Adjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Followed by Doxorubicin Versus Observation for High-Grade Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Phase III NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Danielle Enserro; Helen Hatcher; Petronella B Ottevanger; Anders Krarup-Hansen; Jean-Yves Blay; Cyril Fisher; Katherine M Moxley; Shashikant B Lele; Jayanthi S Lea; Krishnansu S Tewari; Premal H Thaker; Oliver Zivanovic; David M O'Malley; Katina Robison; David S Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  [Uterine sarcoma treatment].

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus.

Authors:  Aaron H Wolfson; Mark F Brady; Thomas Rocereto; Robert S Mannel; Yi-Chun Lee; Robert J Futoran; David E Cohn; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Treatment of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Roisin O'Cearbhaill; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Robert A Soslow; Mario M Leitao; Carol Aghajanian; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos; Stelios Fotiou; Vassilios Kouloulias; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.