OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to design HEMA-free all-in-one self-etch model adhesives without phase separation, and to investigate their efficiency on extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compositions of adhesives in mass% (1): UDMA (25), 4-META (20), H(2)O (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 35, and 45), balance of acetone or ethanol. (2): UDMA (35), 4-META or 4-MET (28), H(2)O (0, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8), balance of acetone. Phase separation was evaluated on samples exposed to ambient atmosphere. Conventional shear bond strengths (SBS, n=8) were determined on human enamel and dentin. Marginal adaptation (MGW, n=8) was assessed in cylindrical butt-joint dentin cavities. RESULTS: Solutions (1) and (2) with 5 and 8% or less water content, respectively, showed no phase separation. SBSs on enamel were not different within the acetone- or ethanol-group and between the adhesive groups (1). Water content of adhesives (2) was a significant determinant of enamel SBSs, groups with 4-META or 4-MET were not different (p>0.05). Dentin SBSs with adhesives (1) were not different (p>0.05) within solvent groups, yet higher for acetone-dissolved adhesives (p<0.05). Dentin SBSs with adhesives (2) were different by water content and functional monomer (p<0.05). MGW for solutions (1) were smaller with acetone-dissolved than with ethanol-dissolved adhesives (p<0.001). Acetone solutions between 2 and 45% water content produced almost perfect marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation of adhesives (2) was almost perfect at 5 through 8% water content. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified HEMA-free self-etch adhesives without phase separation were prepared without compromises on bonding efficiency to enamel and dentin.
OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to design HEMA-free all-in-one self-etch model adhesives without phase separation, and to investigate their efficiency on extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Compositions of adhesives in mass% (1): UDMA (25), 4-META (20), H(2)O (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 35, and 45), balance of acetone or ethanol. (2): UDMA (35), 4-META or 4-MET (28), H(2)O (0, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 8), balance of acetone. Phase separation was evaluated on samples exposed to ambient atmosphere. Conventional shear bond strengths (SBS, n=8) were determined on human enamel and dentin. Marginal adaptation (MGW, n=8) was assessed in cylindrical butt-joint dentin cavities. RESULTS: Solutions (1) and (2) with 5 and 8% or less water content, respectively, showed no phase separation. SBSs on enamel were not different within the acetone- or ethanol-group and between the adhesive groups (1). Water content of adhesives (2) was a significant determinant of enamel SBSs, groups with 4-META or 4-MET were not different (p>0.05). Dentin SBSs with adhesives (1) were not different (p>0.05) within solvent groups, yet higher for acetone-dissolved adhesives (p<0.05). Dentin SBSs with adhesives (2) were different by water content and functional monomer (p<0.05). MGW for solutions (1) were smaller with acetone-dissolved than with ethanol-dissolved adhesives (p<0.001). Acetone solutions between 2 and 45% water content produced almost perfect marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation of adhesives (2) was almost perfect at 5 through 8% water content. CONCLUSIONS: Simplified HEMA-free self-etch adhesives without phase separation were prepared without compromises on bonding efficiency to enamel and dentin.
Authors: Marília Oliveira Barbosa; Rodrigo Varella de Carvalho; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Fabrício Aulo Ogliari; Cesar Henrique Zanchi; Evandro Piva; Adriana Fernandes da Silva Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 3.896