Literature DB >> 18377845

Lung cancer screening.

Peter B Bach1.   

Abstract

Because lung cancer frequently presents in an advanced stage when it is incurable, there has been a sustained search for an early diagnosis approach that could detect lung cancer when curable, while having few secondary consequences. Decades of research have evaluated various approaches to lung screening, including routine chest radiograph, sputum cytology, and, most recently, computed tomography (CT) scanning. No study has suggested that any of these approaches will identify life-threatening lung cancers at an earlier disease stage and allow alteration of their natural history. Therefore, no recommending body or professional society recommends using any of these approaches to screen for lung cancer. This general recommendation could change if randomized trials examining CT screening suggest that its benefits outweigh its harms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377845     DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2008.0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw        ISSN: 1540-1405            Impact factor:   11.908


  3 in total

1.  Comparing the benefits of screening for breast cancer and lung cancer using a novel natural history model.

Authors:  Ray S Lin; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Early lung cancer detection using the self-evaluation scoring questionnaire and chest digital radiography: a 3-year follow-up study in China.

Authors:  Bojiang Chen; Youjuan Wang; Huibi Cao; Dan Liu; Shangfu Zhang; Jun Gao; Jianqun Yu; Yan Huang; Weimin Li
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  [Comparative values of different imaging methods in lung cancer screening].

Authors:  Bojiang Chen; Weimin Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2010-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.