Literature DB >> 18377682

Effect of a prebiotic mixture on intestinal comfort and general wellbeing in health.

Oliver Goetze1, Heiko Fruehauf, Daniel Pohl, Marianna Giarrè, Florence Rochat, Kurt Ornstein, Dieter Menne, Michael Fried, Miriam Thumshirn.   

Abstract

Specific carbohydrates, i.e. prebiotics such as fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS), are not digested in the small intestine but fermented in the colon. Besides beneficial health effects of an enhanced bifidobacteria population, intestinal gas production resulting from fermentation can induce abdominal symptoms. Partial replacement with slowly fermented acacia gum may attenuate side effects. The aim was to compare the effects of FOS with those of a prebiotic mixture (50 % FOS and 50 % acacia gum; BLEND) and a rapidly absorbed carbohydrate (maltodextrin) on general intestinal wellbeing, abdominal comfort and anorectal sensory function. Twenty volunteers (eight male and twelve female; age 20-37 years) completed this double-blind, randomised study with two cycles of a 2-week run-in phase (10 g maltodextrin) followed by 5 weeks of 10 g FOS or BLEND once daily, separated by a 4-week wash-out interval. Abdominal symptoms and general wellbeing were documented by telephone interview or Internet twice weekly. Rectal sensations were assessed by a visual analogue scale during a rectal barostat test after FOS and BLEND treatment. Both FOS and BLEND induced more side effects than maltodextrin. Belching was more pronounced under FOS compared with BLEND (P = 0.09 for females; P = 0.01 for males), and for self-reported general wellbeing strong sex differences were reported (P = 0.002). Urgency scores during rectal barostat were higher with FOS than BLEND (P = 0.01). Faced with a growing range of supplemented food products, consumers may benefit from prebiotic mixtures which cause fewer abdominal side effects. Sex differences must be taken in consideration when food supplements are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377682     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508960918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  9 in total

1.  Effect of composite yogurt enriched with acacia fiber and Bifidobacterium lactis.

Authors:  Yang Won Min; Sang Un Park; Yeon Sil Jang; Young-Ho Kim; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Seo Hyun Ko; Nami Joo; Sun Im Kim; Cheol-Hyun Kim; Dong Kyung Chang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Development of freeze dried synbiotic formulation using a probiotic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum.

Authors:  T Dhewa; S Pant; Vijendra Mishra
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Christian M Lo Cascio; Oliver Goetze; Tsogyal D Latshang; Sena Bluemel; Thomas Frauenfelder; Konrad E Bloch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  4G-β-D-galactosylsucrose as a prebiotics may improve underweight in inpatients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Takahiko Nagamine; Yumiko Ido; Masaru Nakamura; Takehiko Okamura
Journal:  Biosci Microbiota Food Health       Date:  2018-01-06

5.  Pilot study of probiotic/colostrum supplementation on gut function in children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Authors:  Megan R Sanctuary; Jennifer N Kain; Shin Yu Chen; Karen Kalanetra; Danielle G Lemay; Destanie R Rose; Houa T Yang; Daniel J Tancredi; J Bruce German; Carolyn M Slupsky; Paul Ashwood; David A Mills; Jennifer T Smilowitz; Kathleen Angkustsiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pyrodextrin enhances intestinal function through changing the intestinal microbiota composition and metabolism in early weaned piglets.

Authors:  Lihui Zhu; Rongrong Liao; Weilong Tu; Yonghong Lu; Xuan Cai
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The Prebiotic Potential of Inulin-type Fructans: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Riley L Hughes; David A Alvarado; Kelly S Swanson; Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Impact of a synbiotic food on the gut microbial ecology and metabolic profiles.

Authors:  Beatrice Vitali; Maurice Ndagijimana; Federica Cruciani; Paola Carnevali; Marco Candela; Maria Elisabetta Guerzoni; Patrizia Brigidi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Synbiotic effects of β-glucans from cauliflower mushroom and Lactobacillus fermentum on metabolic changes and gut microbiome in estrogen-deficient rats.

Authors:  Seong-Yeop Jeong; Suna Kang; Cao Shi Hua; Zhang Ting; Sunmin Park
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.523

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.