Literature DB >> 18377202

The definition and function of interview structure in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic interviews.

Stephen M Beck1, J Christopher Perry.   

Abstract

The concept of interview structure has been discussed in the psychodynamic, psychiatric, and psychodiagnostic testing literature as a factor which affects the form and depth of an informant's responses. However, the specific characteristics and clinical implications of structure have not been studied nor measured systematically. We define interview structure as a function of the degree to which the interviewer controls, directs, and shapes the verbal interchange between the two protagonists. This involves regulating the length, focus, and depth of the interviewee's discourse as well as imposing limits and direction through the interviewer's questions and interventions. Based on a review of the literature on interviewing in psychiatric, psychological, and other social sciences, we propose seven quantitative measures that operationalize aspects of the concept of interview structure. Measures 1 through 5 relate to quantity of speech and yield percentages and averages allowing one to compare speech production between subject and interviewer. Measure 6 reflects the way the interviewer shapes his interventions that are formulated as declarative demands or questions, as open, semi-open, or closed-ended. Measure 7 is the percentage of non-lexical or brief utterances from the interviewer that serve as mild reinforcing acknowledgements, such as "mm-hmm" or "I see." In a companion article, we examine how these measures converge with another construct of structure and discriminate five different types of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic interviews in common use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377202     DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2008.71.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry        ISSN: 0033-2747            Impact factor:   2.458


  3 in total

Review 1.  Psychopathology in bariatric surgery candidates: a review of studies using structured diagnostic interviews.

Authors:  Sarah Malik; James E Mitchell; Scott Engel; Ross Crosby; Steve Wonderlich
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.735

2.  Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample.

Authors:  Julie Nordgaard; Rasmus Revsbech; Ditte Sæbye; Josef Parnas
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts in a New Zealand birth cohort.

Authors:  Daniel D L Coppersmith; Shyamala Nada-Raja; Annette L Beautrais
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.839

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.