Literature DB >> 18377174

Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.

Yang-Ming Huang1, Alan Baddeley, Andrew W Young.   

Abstract

The attentional blink paradigm was used to examine whether emotional stimuli always capture attention. The processing requirement for emotional stimuli in a rapid sequential visual presentation stream was manipulated to investigate the circumstances under which emotional distractors capture attention, as reflected in an enhanced attentional blink effect. Emotional distractors did not cause more interference than neutral distractors on target identification when perceptual or phonological processing of stimuli was required, showing that emotional processing is not as automatic as previously hypothesized. Only when semantic processing of stimuli was required did emotional distractors capture more attention than neutral distractors and increase attentional blink magnitude. Combining the results from 5 experiments, the authors conclude that semantic processing can modulate the attentional capture effect of emotional stimuli. (Copyright) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377174     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  16 in total

1.  The effect of fearful faces on the attentional blink is task dependent.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Jan Zwickel; Johanna Ritter; Maria Kitzmantel; Werner X Schneider
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 2.  Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Temporal allocation of attention toward threat in individuals with posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Authors:  Nader Amir; Charles T Taylor; Jessica A Bomyea; Christal L Badour
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2009-07-14

4.  Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking.

Authors:  Katherine S Moore; Elizabeth A Wiemers; Ariel Kershner; Korissa Belville; Jaimie Jasina; Aziza Ransome; Jessica Avanzato
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Glancing and then looking: on the role of body, affect, and meaning in cognitive control.

Authors:  Li Su; Howard Bowman; Philip Barnard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-20

6.  On the blink: the importance of target-distractor similarity in eliciting an attentional blink with faces.

Authors:  Kathrin Müsch; Andreas K Engel; Till R Schneider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?

Authors:  Susanne Augst; Thomas Kleinsorge; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  The effects of a distracting N-back task on recognition memory are reduced by negative emotional intensity.

Authors:  Luciano G Buratto; Claire L Pottage; Charity Brown; Catriona M Morrison; Alexandre Schaefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Murder, she wrote: enhanced sensitivity to negative word valence.

Authors:  Maha Nasrallah; David Carmel; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-10

10.  A controlled approach to the emotional dilution of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Kathryn Fackrell; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.