Literature DB >> 18377167

Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.

David Waller1, Adam R Richardson.   

Abstract

The tendency to underestimate egocentric distances in immersive virtual environments (VEs) is not well understood. However, previous research (A. R. Richardson & D. Waller, 2007) has demonstrated that a brief period of interaction with the VE prior to making distance judgments can effectively eliminate subsequent underestimation. Here the authors examine the mechanism underlying the effect of VE interaction and the conditions that may give rise to it. In Experiment 1, after interacting with an immersive VE, participants tended to overestimate distances in the physical world, indicating that the interaction involved a recalibration of the perceptual-motor system. Experiment 2 demonstrates that visual information is not necessary (and that body-based information is necessary) during the interaction period for it to have a positive effect on subsequent distance estimation accuracy. Experiment 3 illustrates that the interaction task does not need to be goal directed in order to be effective. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18377167     DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  10 in total

1.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparing distance perception in different virtual environments.

Authors:  Chiara Saracini; Ronny Franke; Eberhard Blümel; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

3.  Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture.

Authors:  Aaron J Fath; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Estimating distance in real and virtual environments: Does order make a difference?

Authors:  Christine J Ziemer; Jodie M Plumert; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The importance of postural cues for determining eye height in immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Markus Leyrer; Sally A Linkenauger; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Betty J Mohler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Quantifying people's experience during flood events with implications for hazard risk communication.

Authors:  Nataliya Tkachenko; Rob Procter; Stephen Jarvis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does perceptual-motor calibration generalize across two different forms of locomotion? Investigations of walking and wheelchairs.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kunz; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Matching optical flow to motor speed in virtual reality while running on a treadmill.

Authors:  Martina Caramenti; Claudio L Lafortuna; Elena Mugellini; Omar Abou Khaled; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Amandine Dubois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Peri-personal space as a prior in coupling visual and proprioceptive signals.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Majed Samad; Andrew Doxon; Justin Clark; Sean Keller; Massimiliano Di Luca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: Influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains.

Authors:  Philipp Maruhn; Sonja Schneider; Klaus Bengler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.