UNLABELLED: There is controversial data in the literature about the characteristics or features of dual hepatitis B and C infection. Several studies have reported that the dual infection has a more severe histological picture; faster progression leading to cirrhosis and a higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the single infections. These findings have not yet been supported. We assessed the patients with dual hepatitis B and C infection with respect to their different features in our country. METHOD: the chronic hepatitis patients of our clinics were tested, and both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive patients with chronic hepatitis were enrolled to the study. All patients were tested for the biochemical parameters and the presence of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Of the 1950 patients, 51 (2.6%) were both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive and 67 were anti-delta positive. Patients were followed up for 5.4+/-2.1 years. Of the 51 dual hepatitis patients, 6 had no HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA detectable by PCR, 36 were only HCV-RNA positive, 9 were only HBV-DNA positive and 3 were both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA positive. Dominant infection in (3/4) of the patients was hepatitis C. Clinical and histological properties of the cases with dual Hepatitis B and C infection showed no significant differences compared to the single infections. In conclusion, regarding the prognosis, no significant differences were found between such dual and single infections. Dual infection with hepatitis B virus and delta virus is a significantly more severe condition than the dual infection with hepatitis B and C viruses.
UNLABELLED: There is controversial data in the literature about the characteristics or features of dual hepatitis B and C infection. Several studies have reported that the dual infection has a more severe histological picture; faster progression leading to cirrhosis and a higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the single infections. These findings have not yet been supported. We assessed the patients with dual hepatitis B and C infection with respect to their different features in our country. METHOD: the chronic hepatitispatients of our clinics were tested, and both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive patients with chronic hepatitis were enrolled to the study. All patients were tested for the biochemical parameters and the presence of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Of the 1950 patients, 51 (2.6%) were both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive and 67 were anti-delta positive. Patients were followed up for 5.4+/-2.1 years. Of the 51 dual hepatitispatients, 6 had no HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA detectable by PCR, 36 were only HCV-RNA positive, 9 were only HBV-DNA positive and 3 were both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA positive. Dominant infection in (3/4) of the patients was hepatitis C. Clinical and histological properties of the cases with dual Hepatitis B and C infection showed no significant differences compared to the single infections. In conclusion, regarding the prognosis, no significant differences were found between such dual and single infections. Dual infection with hepatitis B virus and delta virus is a significantly more severe condition than the dual infection with hepatitis B and C viruses.
Authors: Nikolaos Papadopoulos; Maria Papavdi; Anna Pavlidou; Dimitris Konstantinou; Hariklia Kranidioti; George Kontos; John Koskinas; George V Papatheodoridis; Spilios Manolakopoulos; Melanie Deutsch Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-28