OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether the local-regional surgical treatments (breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy) resulted in different overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates for the various molecular breast cancer subtypes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Molecular gene expression profiling has been proposed as a new classification and prognostication system for breast cancer. Current recommendation for local-regional treatment of breast cancer is based on traditional clinicopathologic variables. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 372 breast cancer cases with assessable immunohistochemical data for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu receptor status, diagnosed from 1998 to 2005. Molecular subtypes analyzed were luminal A, luminal B, basal like, and Her-2/neu. RESULTS: No substantial difference was noted in overall survival, and locoregional recurrence rate between the local-regional treatment modalities as a function of the molecular breast cancer subtypes. The basal cell-like subtype was an independent predictor of a poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.97, P < 0.01) and a shorter distant metastasis-free survival time (HR = 3.61, 95% CI 1.27-10.2, P < 0.01), and showed a tendency toward statistical significance as an independent predictor of locoregional recurrence (HR = 3.57, 95% CI 0.93-13.6, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The basal cell-like subtype is associated with a worse prognosis, a higher incidence of distant metastasis, and may be more prone to local recurrence when managed with breast-conserving therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether the local-regional surgical treatments (breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy) resulted in different overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival rates for the various molecular breast cancer subtypes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Molecular gene expression profiling has been proposed as a new classification and prognostication system for breast cancer. Current recommendation for local-regional treatment of breast cancer is based on traditional clinicopathologic variables. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 372 breast cancer cases with assessable immunohistochemical data for ER, PR, and Her-2/neu receptor status, diagnosed from 1998 to 2005. Molecular subtypes analyzed were luminal A, luminal B, basal like, and Her-2/neu. RESULTS: No substantial difference was noted in overall survival, and locoregional recurrence rate between the local-regional treatment modalities as a function of the molecular breast cancer subtypes. The basal cell-like subtype was an independent predictor of a poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-4.97, P < 0.01) and a shorter distant metastasis-free survival time (HR = 3.61, 95% CI 1.27-10.2, P < 0.01), and showed a tendency toward statistical significance as an independent predictor of locoregional recurrence (HR = 3.57, 95% CI 0.93-13.6, P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The basal cell-like subtype is associated with a worse prognosis, a higher incidence of distant metastasis, and may be more prone to local recurrence when managed with breast-conserving therapy.
Authors: Katie M O'Brien; Stephen R Cole; Chiu-Kit Tse; Charles M Perou; Lisa A Carey; William D Foulkes; Lynn G Dressler; Joseph Geradts; Robert C Millikan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Theresa H M Keegan; Mindy C DeRouen; David J Press; Allison W Kurian; Christina A Clarke Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Theresa H M Keegan; David J Press; Li Tao; Mindy C DeRouen; Allison W Kurian; Christina A Clarke; Scarlett L Gomez Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Filomena M Carvalho; Lívia M Bacchi; Kátia M Pincerato; Matt Van de Rijn; Carlos E Bacchi Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Kyubo Kim; Hae Jin Park; Kyung Hwan Shin; Jin Ho Kim; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Seung Do Ahn; Su Ssan Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Jin Hee Kim; Jiyoung Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.679