OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the evidence on the prevalence of cytochrome P450 enzyme polymorphisms as potential genetic factors influencing drug efficacy and safety in the indigenous populations of the American hemispheres. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1985 and 2006 using the Pubmed database. RESULTS: We identified only 10 original research studies on CYP2A6, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 in 13 indigenous American populations. Interethnic differences in the frequency of CYP450 genetic variants existed both among the examined indigenous populations and in comparison with African, Asian and European populations. CONCLUSIONS: There are surprisingly few data on CYP450 enzyme polymorphisms in indigenous American populations, and it is difficult to draw any clear inferences about how these populations might be expected to respond to drugs in relation to other racial or ethnic groups. This lack of information could create a barrier to the use of pharmacogenetic testing in these populations. Collaborative partnerships between indigenous communities and researchers are needed to avail the clinical benefits of CYP450 enzyme polymorphism testing to indigenous populations. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the evidence on the prevalence of cytochrome P450 enzyme polymorphisms as potential genetic factors influencing drug efficacy and safety in the indigenous populations of the American hemispheres. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1985 and 2006 using the Pubmed database. RESULTS: We identified only 10 original research studies on CYP2A6, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2E1 in 13 indigenous American populations. Interethnic differences in the frequency of CYP450 genetic variants existed both among the examined indigenous populations and in comparison with African, Asian and European populations. CONCLUSIONS: There are surprisingly few data on CYP450 enzyme polymorphisms in indigenous American populations, and it is difficult to draw any clear inferences about how these populations might be expected to respond to drugs in relation to other racial or ethnic groups. This lack of information could create a barrier to the use of pharmacogenetic testing in these populations. Collaborative partnerships between indigenous communities and researchers are needed to avail the clinical benefits of CYP450 enzyme polymorphism testing to indigenous populations. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Chelsea T Morales; LeeAnna I Muzquiz; Kevin Howlett; Bernie Azure; Brenda Bodnar; Vernon Finley; Tony Incashola; Cheryl Mathias; Cindi Laukes; Patrick Beatty; Wylie Burke; Mark A Pershouse; Elizabeth A Putnam; Susan Brown Trinidad; Rosalina James; Erica L Woodahl Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2016
Authors: Alison Fohner; LeeAnna I Muzquiz; Melissa A Austin; Andrea Gaedigk; Adam Gordon; Timothy Thornton; Mark J Rieder; Mark A Pershouse; Elizabeth A Putnam; Kevin Howlett; Patrick Beatty; Kenneth E Thummel; Erica L Woodahl Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Jennifer L Shaw; Renee Robinson; Helene Starks; Wylie Burke; Denise A Dillard Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Salma M Wakil; Cao Nguyen; Nzioka P Muiya; Editha Andres; Agnieszka Lykowska-Tarnowska; Batoul Baz; Asma I Tahir; Brian F Meyer; Grant Morahan; Nduna Dzimiri Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2015-02-22 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Saskia Preissner; Katharina Kroll; Mathias Dunkel; Christian Senger; Gady Goldsobel; Daniel Kuzman; Stefan Guenther; Rainer Winnenburg; Michael Schroeder; Robert Preissner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 16.971