Literature DB >> 18375879

Multidimensional preventive home visit programs for community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Anke Huss1, Andreas E Stuck, Laurence Z Rubenstein, Matthias Egger, Kerri M Clough-Gorr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidimensional preventive home visit programs aim at maintaining health and autonomy of older adults and preventing disability and subsequent nursing home admission, but results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been inconsistent. Our objective was to systematically review RCTs examining the effect of home visit programs on mortality, nursing home admissions, and functional status decline.
METHODS: Data sources were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL database, and references. Studies were reviewed to identify RCTs that compared outcome data of older participants in preventive home visit programs with control group outcome data. Publications reporting 21 trials were included. Data on study population, intervention characteristics, outcomes, and trial quality were double-extracted. We conducted random effects meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Pooled effects estimates revealed statistically nonsignificant favorable, and heterogeneous effects on mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.05), functional status decline (OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.77-1.03), and nursing home admission (OR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.68-1.10). A beneficial effect on mortality was seen in younger study populations (OR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94) but not in older populations (OR 1.14, 95% CI, 0.90-1.43). Functional decline was reduced in programs including a clinical examination in the initial assessment (OR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.87) but not in other trials (OR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.88-1.14). There was no single factor explaining the heterogenous effects of trials on nursing home admissions.
CONCLUSION: Multidimensional preventive home visits have the potential to reduce disability burden among older adults when based on multidimensional assessment with clinical examination. Effects on nursing home admissions are heterogeneous and likely depend on multiple factors including population factors, program characteristics, and health care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375879     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/63.3.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  74 in total

1.  Translation Requires Evidence: Does Cancer-Specific CGA Lead to Better Care and Outcomes?

Authors:  Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.990

2.  Community care of vulnerable older people: cause for concern.

Authors:  David L Beales; Alistair J Tulloch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Multidimensional geriatric assessment: back to the future.

Authors:  Darryl Wieland; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Dedicated orthogeriatric service reduces hip fracture mortality.

Authors:  C Y Henderson; E Shanahan; A Butler; B Lenehan; M O'Connor; D Lyons; J P Ryan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Older breast cancer survivors: geriatric assessment domains are associated with poor tolerance of treatment adverse effects and predict mortality over 7 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Andreas E Stuck; Soe Soe Thwin; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  [Acceptance of preventive home visits among frail elderly persons : Participants an non-participants in a Follow-up after 2 and 4 years within the LUCAS longitudinal study].

Authors:  F Pröfener; J Anders; U Dapp; C E Minder; S Golgert; W von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Elderly persons in the risk zone. Design of a multidimensional, health-promoting, randomised three-armed controlled trial for "prefrail" people of 80+ years living at home.

Authors:  Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff; Gunilla Gosman-Hedström; Anna-Karin Edberg; Katarina Wilhelmson; Kajsa Eklund; Anna Duner; Lena Ziden; Anna-Karin Welmer; Sten Landahl
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Relationship between home care service use and changes in the care needs level of Japanese elderly.

Authors:  Gohei Kato; Nanako Tamiya; Masayo Kashiwagi; Mikiya Sato; Hideto Takahashi
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 9.  Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefan Bachmann; Christoph Finger; Anke Huss; Matthias Egger; Andreas E Stuck; Kerri M Clough-Gorr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-20

10.  Feasibility and effects of preventive home visits for at-risk older people: design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Malcolm P Cutchin; Susan Coppola; Vibeke Talley; Judie Svihula; Diane Catellier; Kendra Heatwole Shank
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.