Literature DB >> 18375663

Chemical properties of cow and beef muscles: benchmarking the differences and similarities.

L E Patten1, J M Hodgen, A M Stelzleni, C R Calkins, D D Johnson, B L Gwartney.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify muscles from cow populations that are equivalent or may possibly be made equivalent to muscles from A-maturity, Select-grade cattle in terms of chemical, compositional, and color characteristics. Objective color, expressible moisture, proximate composition, pH, heme iron concentration, and total collagen content were determined for 9 muscles (M. gluteus medius, M. infraspinatus, M. longissimus dorsi, M. psoas major, M. rectus femoris, M. tensor fascia latae, M. teres major, M. triceps brachii lateral-head, and M. triceps brachii long-head) from 15 cattle from each of 5 commercially identified populations [fed beef cows (B-F), non-fed beef cows (B-NF), fed dairy cows (D-F), non-fed dairy cows (D-NF), and A-maturity, Select-grade cattle (SEL)]. Muscles from B-F and B-NF populations were more similar to the SEL than were the D-F and D-NF. There were 2 muscles, the M. infraspinatus and M. teres major, from the population of B-F that were similar, physically and chemically, to SEL in most traits. The majority of the 9 muscles from the cows did not differ (P < 0.05) from SEL for percentage expressible moisture, proximate composition, and total collagen content. However, notable differences in pH, objective color L*, total pigment content, and heme iron content existed between cow populations and SEL. The muscles from SEL had significantly (P < 0.05) lower total pigment and heme iron concentrations. These differences likely relate to the visual appearance of muscles from the different populations of cattle. Two of the 9 muscles studied were similar among cow populations and A-maturity, Select-grade beef.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375663     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  3 in total

1.  Improving Cull Cow Meat Quality Using Vacuum Impregnation.

Authors:  Martha Y Leal-Ramos; Alma D Alarcón-Rojo; Néstor Gutiérrez-Méndez; Hugo Mújica-Paz; Felipe Rodríguez-Almeida; Armando Quintero-Ramos
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 2.  Post-Harvest Strategies to Improve Tenderness of Underutilized Mature Beef: A Review.

Authors:  Jacob R Tuell; Mariah J Nondorf; Yuan H Brad Kim
Journal:  Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 3.  Beef production from cull dairy cows: a review from culling to consumption.

Authors:  Ligia C Moreira; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel M Schaefer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.