Literature DB >> 18375458

Robust techniques for measurement error correction: a review.

Annamaria Guolo1.   

Abstract

Measurement error affecting the independent variables in regression models is a common problem in many scientific areas. It is well known that the implications of ignoring measurement errors in inferential procedures may be substantial, often turning out in unreliable results. Many different measurement error correction techniques have been suggested in literature since the 80's. Most of them require many assumptions on the involved variables to be satisfied. However, it may be usually very hard to check whether these assumptions are satisfied, mainly because of the lack of information about the unobservable and mismeasured phenomenon. Thus, alternatives based on weaker assumptions on the variables may be preferable, in that they offer a gain in robustness of results. In this paper, we provide a review of robust techniques to correct for measurement errors affecting the covariates. Attention is paid to methods which share properties of robustness against misspecifications of relationships between variables. Techniques are grouped according to the kind of the underlying modeling assumptions and the inferential methods. Details about the techniques are given and their applicability is discussed. The basic framework is the epidemiological setting, where literature about the measurement error phenomenon is very substantial.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375458     DOI: 10.1177/0962280207081318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  10 in total

1.  Bias correction by use of errors-in-variables regression models in studies with K-X-ray fluorescence bone lead measurements.

Authors:  Héctor Lamadrid-Figueroa; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Gustavo Angeles; Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Howard Hu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Understanding nutritional epidemiology and its role in policy.

Authors:  Ambika Satija; Edward Yu; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Evaluating marginal genetic correlation of associated loci for complex diseases and traits between European and East Asian populations.

Authors:  Haojie Lu; Ting Wang; Jinhui Zhang; Shuo Zhang; Shuiping Huang; Ping Zeng
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Expected estimating equation using calibration data for generalized linear models with a mixture of Berkson and classical errors in covariates.

Authors:  Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Shen-Ming Lee; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Statistical analysis with missing exposure data measured by proxy respondents: a misclassification problem within a missing-data problem.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Simultaneous Treatment of Missing Data and Measurement Error in HIV Research Using Multiple Overimputation.

Authors:  Michael Schomaker; Sara Hogger; Leigh F Johnson; Christopher J Hoffmann; Till Bärnighausen; Christian Heumann
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Statistical adjustment of genotyping error in a case-control study of childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  Matthew N Cooper; Nicholas H de Klerk; Kathryn R Greenop; Sarra E Jamieson; Denise Anderson; Frank M van Bockxmeer; Bruce K Armstrong; Elizabeth Milne
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Systematic review of statistical approaches to quantify, or correct for, measurement error in a continuous exposure in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Derrick A Bennett; Denise Landry; Julian Little; Cosetta Minelli
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Fabiola Del Greco M; Cosetta Minelli; George Davey Smith; Nuala A Sheehan; John R Thompson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Illustration of Measurement Error Models for Reducing Bias in Nutrition and Obesity Research Using 2-D Body Composition Data.

Authors:  Anarina L Murillo; Olivia Affuso; Courtney M Peterson; Peng Li; Howard W Wiener; Carmen D Tekwe; David B Allison
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.002

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.