BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity affect more than 60% of the adult population in the United States. Most adults who are overweight have a history of previous weight-loss treatment. Exploring individuals' past experiences with weight-loss treatment may allow improvements to the current approach to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine individuals' prior experiences with weight-loss treatment, their treatment preferences, and what they found to be most and least satisfying. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Individuals (N=155) who had registered for a weight-loss study wait list and met standard criteria for a weight-loss program (aged 18 to 55 years and body mass index between 25 and 42). METHODS: Questionnaire packets were mailed to participants. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive analyses of the participants' past history with weight-loss treatment, treatment preference, self-efficacy, therapeutic efficacy, barriers to adherence to weight-loss treatment, barriers to healthy eating, and experiences associated with following a low-fat diet. RESULTS: One hundred ten participants (71%) returned completed questionnaire packets. The sample (82% white, 84% female, aged 42.6+/-8.5 years, and body mass index 33.5+/-5.3) was representative of those who seek weight-loss treatment in research settings. Participants were, on average, aged 21.1+/-8.9 years when they first tried a weight-loss program; 96.3% had tried to lose weight since that first time. The two most frequently tried programs were doing it on their own (93.5%) and commercial programs (70.8%). Barriers included having trouble controlling what I eat when hungry (71.3%), difficulty motivating myself to eat appropriately (66.2%), and using food as a reward (59.3%). Preferred weight-loss regimens were doing it on their own (30.6%) and a research program (22.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Participants were not seeking their preferred treatment. These data can be used to improve weight-loss programs by tailoring programs to meet the needs and preferences of participants.
BACKGROUND: Overweight and obesity affect more than 60% of the adult population in the United States. Most adults who are overweight have a history of previous weight-loss treatment. Exploring individuals' past experiences with weight-loss treatment may allow improvements to the current approach to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To examine individuals' prior experiences with weight-loss treatment, their treatment preferences, and what they found to be most and least satisfying. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Individuals (N=155) who had registered for a weight-loss study wait list and met standard criteria for a weight-loss program (aged 18 to 55 years and body mass index between 25 and 42). METHODS: Questionnaire packets were mailed to participants. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive analyses of the participants' past history with weight-loss treatment, treatment preference, self-efficacy, therapeutic efficacy, barriers to adherence to weight-loss treatment, barriers to healthy eating, and experiences associated with following a low-fat diet. RESULTS: One hundred ten participants (71%) returned completed questionnaire packets. The sample (82% white, 84% female, aged 42.6+/-8.5 years, and body mass index 33.5+/-5.3) was representative of those who seek weight-loss treatment in research settings. Participants were, on average, aged 21.1+/-8.9 years when they first tried a weight-loss program; 96.3% had tried to lose weight since that first time. The two most frequently tried programs were doing it on their own (93.5%) and commercial programs (70.8%). Barriers included having trouble controlling what I eat when hungry (71.3%), difficulty motivating myself to eat appropriately (66.2%), and using food as a reward (59.3%). Preferred weight-loss regimens were doing it on their own (30.6%) and a research program (22.4%). CONCLUSIONS:Participants were not seeking their preferred treatment. These data can be used to improve weight-loss programs by tailoring programs to meet the needs and preferences of participants.
Authors: Rebecca E Lee; Scherezade K Mama; Ashley V Medina; Jacqueline Y Reese-Smith; Jorge A Banda; Charles S Layne; Meggin Baxter; Daniel P O'Connor; Lorna McNeill; Paul A Estabrooks Journal: J Community Health Date: 2011-12
Authors: Ericka M Welsh; Robert W Jeffery; Rona L Levy; Shelby L Langer; Andrew P Flood; Melanie A Jaeb; Patricia S Laqua Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Katherine A Collins; Kim M Huffman; Ruth Q Wolever; Patrick J Smith; Ilene C Siegler; Leanna M Ross; Elizabeth R Hauser; Rong Jiang; John M Jakicic; Paul T Costa; William E Kraus Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2022-01-24
Authors: Megan A McVay; William S Yancy; Christine N Scott; Lindsay Wilson-Barlow; Sandra Woolson; W Clint McSherry; Sandra Allen; Corrine I Voils Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 3.046