Literature DB >> 18375084

Comparative time-kill study of doxycycline, tigecycline, sulbactam, and imipenem against several clones of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Carlos Bantar1, Celia Schell, Graciela Posse, Adriana Limansky, Viviana Ballerini, Liliana Mobilia.   

Abstract

To assess potential alternative options for the treatment of infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, we performed time-kill studies of doxycycline and tigecycline using several isolates recovered from patients residing in 10 different cities in Argentina. Imipenem and sulbactam were also included for comparison purposes. Eleven isolates representing 5 distinctive clones, or isolates with different susceptibility patterns within the same clone, were selected. Tubes containing cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth with and without antibiotics were seeded with a log-phase inoculum of roughly 5 x 10(5) CFU/mL. By using the viable counts determined at 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, and 24-h intervals after inoculation, a 24-h time-kill curve was constructed for each isolate. No bactericidal activity (defined as a >or=3-log(10) CFU/mL decrease in the viable cell counts with respect to the original inoculum) was observed at any time with sulbactam (4 microg/mL) or tigecycline (1 microg/mL), whereas low bactericidal rate (18% of the isolates) was shown for doxycycline (1 microg/mL) and sulbactam (16 microg/mL) after 24 h of incubation. Doxycycline (4 microg/mL) and tigecycline (8 microg/mL) displayed bactericidal activity at 24 h of incubation against 36% and 54% of the isolates, respectively, including the carbapenem-resistant isolate. Corresponding values for imipenem (1 and 4 microg/mL) against the 10 carbapenem-susceptible isolates were 60% and 90%, respectively. The present study confirms the in vitro efficacy of imipenem against A. baumannii, suggests that doxycycline could be a suitable, cost-effective, alternative option in some instances, and sheds light on the potential role of tigecycline in the treatment of infections with this organism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375084     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  4 in total

Review 1.  Tetracycline Antibiotics and Resistance.

Authors:  Trudy H Grossman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Antimicrobial resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: From bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ming-Feng Lin; Chung-Yu Lan
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the in vitro activities of oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Stephan Schmidt; Sreedharan Nair Sabarinath; April Barbour; Darren Abbanat; Prasarn Manitpisitkul; Sue Sha; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Visible light responsive photocatalyst induces progressive and apical-terminus preferential damages on Escherichia coli surfaces.

Authors:  Je-Wen Liou; Ming-Hui Gu; Yen-Kai Chen; Wen-Yi Chen; Yi-Cheng Chen; Yao-Hsuan Tseng; Yu-Jiun Hung; Hsin-Hou Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.