Literature DB >> 18375029

What British women say matters to them about donating an aborted fetus to stem cell research: a focus group study.

Naomi Pfeffer1.   

Abstract

This is the first investigation into what matters to British women when they think about donating an aborted fetus to research, and how stem cell research and therapies might influence their views. Tissue derived from the aborted fetus is considered "the right tool for the job" in some stem cell laboratories. Research using tissue derived from aborted fetuses is permitted in Britain, while deliberate abortion to provide fetal tissue for research is illegal. Investigators are advised to seek women's agreement to donate the fetus after they have signed the consent form for the abortion, and stem cell researchers seek fetuses aborted under the 'social' grounds of the Abortion Act 1967. This research was based on focus groups with women who had both had a termination and had not had a termination. It found that initial enthusiasm for the donation of the aborted fetus for medical research, which was understood as a good thing, diminished as participants gained information and thought more carefully about the implications of such a decision. Lack of knowledge about how aborted fetuses are treated as scientific objects in the stem cell laboratory provoked concerns about mishandling, and invoked in some participants what we have called the duty of care which women feel towards babies and children. The duty of care might apply to other research using aborted fetuses. But what makes stem cell research more troubling is its association with renewal, regeneration, and immortality which participants understood as somehow reinstating and even developing the fetus' physical existence and social biography, the very thing abortion is meant to eliminate. By the end of the focus groups, participants had co-produced a tendency to refuse to donate aborted fetuses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18375029     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  8 in total

1.  Perception and knowledge about stem cell and tissue engineering research: a survey amongst researchers and medical practitioners in perinatology.

Authors:  Léonardo Gucciardo; Philip De Koninck; Catherine Verfaillie; Rik Lories; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Impact of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate to biobanks: an experimental survey.

Authors:  Michele C Gornick; Kerry A Ryan; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  'Not taken in by media hype': how potential donors, recipients and members of the general public perceive stem cell research.

Authors:  V L Peddie; M Porter; C Counsell; L Caie; D Pearson; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Consenting futures: professional views on social, clinical and ethical aspects of information feedback to embryo donors in human embryonic stem cell research.

Authors:  Kathryn Ehrich; Clare Williams; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2010-06

5.  The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate.

Authors:  Raymond G De Vries; Tom Tomlinson; H Myra Kim; Chris D Krenz; Kerry A Ryan; Nicole Lehpamer; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2016-03-11

6.  Understanding the Public's Reservations about Broad Consent and Study-By-Study Consent for Donations to a Biobank: Results of a National Survey.

Authors:  Raymond Gene De Vries; Tom Tomlinson; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Chris Krenz; Diana Haggerty; Kerry A Ryan; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stakeholder views and attitudes towards prenatal and postnatal transplantation of fetal mesenchymal stem cells to treat Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Melissa Hill; Celine Lewis; Megan Riddington; Belinda Crowe; Catherine DeVile; Anna L David; Oliver Semler; Magnus Westgren; Cecilia Götherström; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Gender dynamics in the donation field: human tissue donation for research, therapy and feeding.

Authors:  Julie Kent; Maria Fannin; Sally Dowling
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2018-08-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.