Literature DB >> 18374603

Right temporopolar activation associated with unique perception.

Tomoki Asari1, Seiki Konishi, Koji Jimura, Junichi Chikazoe, Noriko Nakamura, Yasushi Miyashita.   

Abstract

Unique mode of perception, or the ability to see things differently from others, is one of the psychological resources required for creative mental activities. Behavioral studies using ambiguous visual stimuli have successfully induced diverse responses from subjects, and the unique responses defined in this paradigm were observed in higher frequency in the artistic population as compared to the nonartistic population. However, the neural substrates that underlie such unique perception have yet to be investigated. In the present study, ten ambiguous figures were used as stimuli. The subjects were instructed to say what the figures looked like during functional MRI scanning. The responses were classified as "frequent", "infrequent" or "unique" responses based on the appearance frequency of the same response in an independent age- and gender-matched control group. An event-related analysis contrasting unique vs. frequent responses revealed the greatest activation in the right temporal pole, which survived a whole brain multiple comparison. An alternative parametric modulation analysis was also performed to show that potentially confounding perceptual effects deriving from differences in visual stimuli make no significant contribution to this temporopolar activation. Previous neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies have shown the involvement of the temporal pole in perception-emotion linkage. Thus, our results suggest that unique perception is produced by the integration of perceptual and emotional processes, and this integration might underlie essential parts of creative mental activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374603     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Affective creativity meets classic creativity in the scanner.

Authors:  Corinna M Perchtold; Ilona Papousek; Karl Koschutnig; Christian Rominger; Hannelore Weber; Elisabeth M Weiss; Andreas Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Painful heat reveals hyperexcitability of the temporal pole in interictal and ictal migraine States.

Authors:  E A Moulton; L Becerra; N Maleki; G Pendse; S Tully; R Hargreaves; R Burstein; D Borsook
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens region in alcoholism affects reward processing.

Authors:  Marcus Heldmann; Georg Berding; Jürgen Voges; Bernhard Bogerts; Imke Galazky; Ulf Müller; Gunther Baillot; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Creative, yet not unique? Paranormal belief, but not self-rated creative ideation behavior is associated with a higher propensity to perceive unique meanings in randomness.

Authors:  Christian Rominger; Andreas Fink; Corinna M Perchtold-Stefan; Günter Schulter; Elisabeth M Weiss; Ilona Papousek
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-04-12

5.  Enhancement of visual attention precedes the emergence of novel metaphor interpretations.

Authors:  Asuka Terai; Masanori Nakagawa; Takashi Kusumi; Yasuharu Koike; Koji Jimura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-26

6.  Biochemical support for the "threshold" theory of creativity: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Rex E Jung; Charles Gasparovic; Robert S Chavez; Ranee A Flores; Shirley M Smith; Arvind Caprihan; Ronald A Yeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data.

Authors:  Gil Gonen-Yaacovi; Leonardo Cruz de Souza; Richard Levy; Marika Urbanski; Goulven Josse; Emmanuelle Volle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Where do bright ideas occur in our brain? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies of domain-specific creativity.

Authors:  Maddalena Boccia; Laura Piccardi; Liana Palermo; Raffaella Nori; Massimiliano Palmiero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-11

9.  Subjective somatosensory experiences disclosed by focused attention: cortical-hippocampal-insular and amygdala contributions.

Authors:  Clemens C C Bauer; Fernando A Barrios; José-Luis Díaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neuroanatomy of creativity.

Authors:  Rex E Jung; Judith M Segall; H Jeremy Bockholt; Ranee A Flores; Shirley M Smith; Robert S Chavez; Richard J Haier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.