PURPOSE: Mediastinoscopy is routinely carried out on the majority of nonmetastatic, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in our institution. We used the results of mediastinoscopy from a Stage III NSCLC cohort to assess the reliability of positron emission tomography (PET) scans at identifying involved mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) when used during radiotherapy planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mediastinoscopy was the gold standard. Characteristics of PET were calculated for nodal sensitivity. To compare the impact on contouring, theoretical nodal targets (NTs) containing involved MLNs were generated using PET and mediastinoscopy. We determined whether the NT derived from PET (NT-P) was equivalent to, greater than, or less than that seen with the mediastinoscopy (NT-M). RESULTS: Data for 122 patients with Stage III NSCLC, treated between 2000 and 2004, were analyzed. After exclusions, 87 patients with Stage III disease by mediastinoscopy were analyzed. Overall PET sensitivity was 61% and positive predictive value was 94%. Of the 87 patients, 33 (38%) had no abnormal MLN findings by PET. Of 36 Stage IIIA cancer patients, 18 (50%) had NT-P equivalent to NT-M, 10 (28%) had smaller NT-Ps, and 8 (22%) had larger NT-Ps compared with NT-Ms. Of 18 Stage IIIB cancer patients, NTs were equivalent in 6 (34%); in 1 patient (5%) NT-P was larger than the corresponding NT-M, and in 11 (61%) smaller than the corresponding NT-M. CONCLUSIONS: In this study PET had modest sensitivity to detect MLN involvement and underestimated the extent of involved nodes for target definition. The role of PET in mediastinal contouring needs to be evaluated prospectively and ideally correlated with a pathology standard.
PURPOSE: Mediastinoscopy is routinely carried out on the majority of nonmetastatic, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in our institution. We used the results of mediastinoscopy from a Stage III NSCLC cohort to assess the reliability of positron emission tomography (PET) scans at identifying involved mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) when used during radiotherapy planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mediastinoscopy was the gold standard. Characteristics of PET were calculated for nodal sensitivity. To compare the impact on contouring, theoretical nodal targets (NTs) containing involved MLNs were generated using PET and mediastinoscopy. We determined whether the NT derived from PET (NT-P) was equivalent to, greater than, or less than that seen with the mediastinoscopy (NT-M). RESULTS: Data for 122 patients with Stage III NSCLC, treated between 2000 and 2004, were analyzed. After exclusions, 87 patients with Stage III disease by mediastinoscopy were analyzed. Overall PET sensitivity was 61% and positive predictive value was 94%. Of the 87 patients, 33 (38%) had no abnormal MLN findings by PET. Of 36 Stage IIIA cancerpatients, 18 (50%) had NT-P equivalent to NT-M, 10 (28%) had smaller NT-Ps, and 8 (22%) had larger NT-Ps compared with NT-Ms. Of 18 Stage IIIB cancerpatients, NTs were equivalent in 6 (34%); in 1 patient (5%) NT-P was larger than the corresponding NT-M, and in 11 (61%) smaller than the corresponding NT-M. CONCLUSIONS: In this study PET had modest sensitivity to detect MLN involvement and underestimated the extent of involved nodes for target definition. The role of PET in mediastinal contouring needs to be evaluated prospectively and ideally correlated with a pathology standard.
Authors: J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr Journal: Radiologe Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Antoni Vila; Alberto Sánchez-Reyes; Carles Conill; Juan Domingo Gispert; Carlos Trampal; Carmen Láinez; Jordi Vayreda; Agustí Pedro Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Aparna H Kesarwala; Christine J Ko; Holly Ning; Eric Xanthopoulos; Karl E Haglund; William P O'Meara; Charles B Simone; Ramesh Rengan Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12
Authors: Radovan Vojtíšek; Jan Mužík; Pavel Slampa; Marie Budíková; Jaroslav Hejsek; Petr Smolák; Jiří Ferda; Jindřich Fínek Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2013-10-17
Authors: R C Nichols; S H Huh; B S Hoppe; R H Henderson; Z Li; S Flampouri; H J D'Agostino; J D Cury; D C Pham; N P Mendenhall Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08
Authors: Sofia C Vaz; Judit A Adam; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Pierre Vera; Wouter van Elmpt; Ken Herrmann; Rodney J Hicks; Yolande Lievens; Andrea Santos; Heiko Schöder; Bernard Dubray; Dimitris Visvikis; Esther G C Troost; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057