Literature DB >> 18374513

Utility of positron emission tomography compared with mediastinoscopy for delineating involved lymph nodes in stage III lung cancer: insights for radiotherapy planning from a surgical cohort.

Gregory M M Videtic1, Thomas W Rice, Sudish Murthy, John H Suh, Jerrold P Saxton, David J Adelstein, Tarek M Mekhail.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mediastinoscopy is routinely carried out on the majority of nonmetastatic, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in our institution. We used the results of mediastinoscopy from a Stage III NSCLC cohort to assess the reliability of positron emission tomography (PET) scans at identifying involved mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) when used during radiotherapy planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Mediastinoscopy was the gold standard. Characteristics of PET were calculated for nodal sensitivity. To compare the impact on contouring, theoretical nodal targets (NTs) containing involved MLNs were generated using PET and mediastinoscopy. We determined whether the NT derived from PET (NT-P) was equivalent to, greater than, or less than that seen with the mediastinoscopy (NT-M).
RESULTS: Data for 122 patients with Stage III NSCLC, treated between 2000 and 2004, were analyzed. After exclusions, 87 patients with Stage III disease by mediastinoscopy were analyzed. Overall PET sensitivity was 61% and positive predictive value was 94%. Of the 87 patients, 33 (38%) had no abnormal MLN findings by PET. Of 36 Stage IIIA cancer patients, 18 (50%) had NT-P equivalent to NT-M, 10 (28%) had smaller NT-Ps, and 8 (22%) had larger NT-Ps compared with NT-Ms. Of 18 Stage IIIB cancer patients, NTs were equivalent in 6 (34%); in 1 patient (5%) NT-P was larger than the corresponding NT-M, and in 11 (61%) smaller than the corresponding NT-M.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study PET had modest sensitivity to detect MLN involvement and underestimated the extent of involved nodes for target definition. The role of PET in mediastinal contouring needs to be evaluated prospectively and ideally correlated with a pathology standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374513     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  [Image-guided radiation therapy].

Authors:  J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) for better target volume definition in radiation therapy planning.

Authors:  Antoni Vila; Alberto Sánchez-Reyes; Carles Conill; Juan Domingo Gispert; Carlos Trampal; Carmen Láinez; Jordi Vayreda; Agustí Pedro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy for elective nodal irradiation and involved-field radiation in the definitive treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a dosimetric study.

Authors:  Aparna H Kesarwala; Christine J Ko; Holly Ning; Eric Xanthopoulos; Karl E Haglund; William P O'Meara; Charles B Simone; Ramesh Rengan
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 4.  Anatomic, functional and molecular imaging in lung cancer precision radiation therapy: treatment response assessment and radiation therapy personalization.

Authors:  Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

Review 5.  18F-FDG PET/CT for image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Eric C Ford; Joseph Herman; Ellen Yorke; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The impact of PET/CT scanning on the size of target volumes, radiation exposure of organs at risk, TCP and NTCP, in the radiotherapy planning of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Radovan Vojtíšek; Jan Mužík; Pavel Slampa; Marie Budíková; Jaroslav Hejsek; Petr Smolák; Jiří Ferda; Jindřich Fínek
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-17

7.  Use of FDG-PET in Radiation Treatment Planning for Thoracic Cancers.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Shirai; Akiko Nakagawa; Takanori Abe; Masahiro Kawahara; Jun-Ichi Saitoh; Tatsuya Ohno; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-14

8.  Protons safely allow coverage of high-risk nodes for patients with regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R C Nichols; S H Huh; B S Hoppe; R H Henderson; Z Li; S Flampouri; H J D'Agostino; J D Cury; D C Pham; N P Mendenhall
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08

Review 9.  Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT external beam radiation treatment planning in lung cancer V1.0.

Authors:  Sofia C Vaz; Judit A Adam; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Pierre Vera; Wouter van Elmpt; Ken Herrmann; Rodney J Hicks; Yolande Lievens; Andrea Santos; Heiko Schöder; Bernard Dubray; Dimitris Visvikis; Esther G C Troost; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 10.057

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.