Literature DB >> 18374279

Hierarchical changepoint models for biochemical markers illustrated by tracking postradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen series in men with prostate cancer.

Carine A Bellera1, James A Hanley, Lawrence Joseph, Peter C Albertsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biomarkers provide valuable information when detecting disease onset or monitoring disease progression; examples include bone mineral density (for osteoporosis), cholesterol (for coronary artery diseases), or prostate-specific antigens (PSA, for prostate cancer). Characteristics of markers series can then be used as prognostic factors of disease progression, such as the postradiotherapy PSA doubling time in men treated for prostate cancer. The statistical analysis of such data has to incorporate the within and between-series variabilities, the complex patterns of the series over time, the unbalanced format of the data, and the possibly nonconstant precision of the measurements.
METHODS: We base our analysis on a population-based cohort of 470 men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer; after treatment, the log(2)PSA concentrations follow a piecewise-linear pattern. We illustrate the flexibility of Bayesian hierarchical changepoint models by estimating the individual and population postradiotherapy log(2)PSA profiles; parameters such as the PSA nadir and the PSA doubling time were estimated, and their associations with baseline patient characteristics were investigated. The residual PSA variability was modeled as a function of the PSA concentration. For comparison purposes, two alternative models were briefly considered.
RESULTS: Precise estimates of all parameters of the PSA trajectory are provided at both the individual and population levels. Estimates suggest greater PSA variability at lower PSA concentrations, as well as an association between shorter PSAdts and greater baseline PSA levels, higher Gleason scores, and older age.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Bayesian hierarchical changepoint models accommodates multiple complex features of longitudinal data, permits realistic modeling of the variability as a function of the marker concentration, and provides precise estimates of all clinically important parameters. This type of model should be applicable to the study of marker series in other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374279     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of treatment efficacy using a Bayesian mixture piecewise linear model of longitudinal biomarkers.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Dai Feng; Brian Neelon; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian hierarchical changepoint methods in modeling the tumor growth profiles in xenograft experiments.

Authors:  Lili Zhao; Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Daniel Normolle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Bayesian piecewise mixture model for racial disparity in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  L Zhao; M Banerjee
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Timing and effect of a safe routes to school program on child pedestrian injury risk during school travel hours: Bayesian changepoint and difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Charles DiMaggio; Qixuan Chen; Peter A Muennig; Guohua Li
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-29

5.  Radiation dose-response (a Bayesian model) in the radiotherapy of the localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: the reliability of PSA slope changes as a response surrogate endpoint.

Authors:  Reza Ali Mohammadpour; Jamshid Yazdani-Charati; SZahra Faghani; Ahad Alizadeh; Mohammadreza Barzegartahamtan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Early diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia based on trajectory classification with compartment modeling.

Authors:  Claire Burny; Muriel Rabilloud; François Golfier; Jérôme Massardier; Touria Hajri; Anne-Marie Schott; Fabien Subtil
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Sample size and classification error for Bayesian change-point models with unlabelled sub-groups and incomplete follow-up.

Authors:  Simon R White; Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Fiona E Matthews
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.021

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.