Literature DB >> 18374232

Virtual HDR CyberKnife treatment for localized prostatic carcinoma: dosimetry comparison with HDR brachytherapy and preliminary clinical observations.

Donald B Fuller1, John Naitoh, Charles Lee, Steven Hardy, Haoran Jin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We tested our ability to approximate the dose (38 Gy), fractionation (four fractions), and distribution of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer with CyberKnife (CK) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans. We also report early clinical observations of CK SBRT treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients were treated with CK. For each CK SBRT plan, an HDR plan was designed using common contour sets and simulated HDR catheters. Planning target volume coverage, intraprostatic dose escalation, and urethra, rectum, and bladder exposure were compared.
RESULTS: Planning target volume coverage by the prescription dose was similar for CK SBRT and HDR plans, whereas percent of volume of interest receiving 125% of prescribed radiation dose (V125) and V150 values were higher for HDR, reflecting higher doses near HDR source dwell positions. Urethra dose comparisons were lower for CK SBRT in 9 of 10 cases, suggesting that CK SBRT may more effectively limit urethra dose. Bladder maximum point doses were higher with HDR, but bladder dose falloff beyond the maximum dose region was more rapid with HDR. Maximum rectal wall doses were similar, but CK SBRT created sharper rectal dose falloff beyond the maximum dose region. Second CK SBRT plans, constructed by equating urethra radiation dose received by point of maximum exposure of volume of interest to the HDR plan, significantly increased V125 and V150. Clinically, 4-month post-CK SBRT median prostate-specific antigen levels decreased 86% from baseline. Acute toxicity was primarily urologic and returned to baseline by 2 months. Acute rectal morbidity was minimal and transient.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to construct CK SBRT plans that closely recapitulate HDR dosimetry and deliver the plans noninvasively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18374232     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  59 in total

Review 1.  Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy?

Authors:  Stefano Arcangeli; Linda Agolli; Vittorio Donato
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-09-10

2.  Point/Counterpoint. Medical use of all high activity sources should be eliminated for security concerns.

Authors:  Jacek Capala; Steven J Goetsch; Colin G Orton
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Simple diagrammatic method to delineate male urethra in prostate cancer radiotherapy: an MRI based approach.

Authors:  Tejinder Kataria; Deepak Gupta; Shikha Goyal; Shyam S Bisht; Ravi Chaudhary; Kushal Narang; Susovan Banerjee; Trinanjan Basu; Ashu Abhishek; Sasikumar Sambasivam; Nisha T Vishnu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Challapalli; E Jones; C Harvey; G O Hellawell; S A Mangar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Robotic ultrasound-guided SBRT of the prostate: feasibility with respect to plan quality.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Ivo Kuhlemann; Philipp Jauer; Ralf Bruder; Floris Ernst; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: comparison of toxicity.

Authors:  James B Yu; Laura D Cramer; Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Arnold L Potosky; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A survey of stereotactic body radiotherapy use in the United States.

Authors:  Hubert Pan; Daniel R Simpson; Loren K Mell; Arno J Mundt; Joshua D Lawson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Interfraction Anatomical Variability Can Lead to Significantly Increased Rectal Dose for Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Wahl; Martina Descovich; Erin Shugard; Dilini Pinnaduwage; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Albert Chang; Mack Roach; Alexander Gottschalk; Josephine Chen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-08

9.  Short-term outcomes of CyberKnife therapy for advanced high-risk tumors: A report of 160 cases.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Wang; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Peng Jiang; Jian-Jun Ma; Zhen Qu; Xi-Lin Wang; Jun-Ti Li; Xi-Feng Jia
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Clinical application of CyberKnife for high-risk central nervous system tumors: A clinical trial report of 60 cases.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Peng Jiang; Jian-Jun Ma; Zhen Qu; Han-Chen Liu; Shan-Shan Wang; Yi-Shan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.