RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although demand for medication is regarded as one of the most important factors in pharmaceutical expenditure, little is known about patients' influence on drug prescribing. This study assesses the influence exerted on drug prescribing by patients' attitudes and expectations, and by doctors' perception of such expectations. METHOD: We conducted a population-based cohort study covering 937 subjects attending a health centre in the northwest of Spain. Prescription-drug advertising directly targeted at patients is banned in Spain. We conducted home-based interviews at the start of follow-up to assess patients' attitudes, and monthly telephone interviews during the 1-year follow-up period to assess consumption of medical drugs and medical visits. Using nested case-control study covering 127 of the cohort subjects who attended the health centre, we assessed patients' pre-consultation expectations for prescriptions, doctors' perception of such patients' expectations, and the drugs actually prescribed. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 69.3% answered the home-based questionnaire, 77.6% completed 11 or more months of follow-up, and 100% of cohort subjects who attended the health centre responded to the pre-consultation survey conducted in the waiting room. Patients' attitudes, though not associated with prescription (P > 0.1), were, however, associated with demand for medical consultation (P < 0.01), self-medication (P < 0.01) and prescription expectations (P < 0.01). Although doctors' perception of patients' expectations did indeed show an association with drug prescribing (P = 0.001), there was no association between patients' expectations and doctors' perception of such expectations (P > 0.1), as these tended to be overestimated by doctors. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, although doctors prescribe in accordance with what they believe their patients expect, in practice patients exert no influence on drug prescribing because their prescription expectations are misconstrued by doctors, who overestimate them.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Although demand for medication is regarded as one of the most important factors in pharmaceutical expenditure, little is known about patients' influence on drug prescribing. This study assesses the influence exerted on drug prescribing by patients' attitudes and expectations, and by doctors' perception of such expectations. METHOD: We conducted a population-based cohort study covering 937 subjects attending a health centre in the northwest of Spain. Prescription-drug advertising directly targeted at patients is banned in Spain. We conducted home-based interviews at the start of follow-up to assess patients' attitudes, and monthly telephone interviews during the 1-year follow-up period to assess consumption of medical drugs and medical visits. Using nested case-control study covering 127 of the cohort subjects who attended the health centre, we assessed patients' pre-consultation expectations for prescriptions, doctors' perception of such patients' expectations, and the drugs actually prescribed. RESULTS: Of the total sample, 69.3% answered the home-based questionnaire, 77.6% completed 11 or more months of follow-up, and 100% of cohort subjects who attended the health centre responded to the pre-consultation survey conducted in the waiting room. Patients' attitudes, though not associated with prescription (P > 0.1), were, however, associated with demand for medical consultation (P < 0.01), self-medication (P < 0.01) and prescription expectations (P < 0.01). Although doctors' perception of patients' expectations did indeed show an association with drug prescribing (P = 0.001), there was no association between patients' expectations and doctors' perception of such expectations (P > 0.1), as these tended to be overestimated by doctors. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, although doctors prescribe in accordance with what they believe their patients expect, in practice patients exert no influence on drug prescribing because their prescription expectations are misconstrued by doctors, who overestimate them.
Authors: Johan Burisch; Daniel Bergemalm; Jonas Halfvarson; Viktor Domislovic; Zeljko Krznaric; Adrian Goldis; Jens F Dahlerup; Pia Oksanen; Pekka Collin; Luisa de Castro; Vicent Hernandez; Svetlana Turcan; Elena Belousova; Renata D'Incà; Alessandro Sartini; Daniela Valpiani; Martina Giannotta; Ravi Misra; Naila Arebi; Dana Duricova; Martin Bortlik; Kelly Gatt; Pierre Ellul; Natalia Pedersen; Jens Kjeldsen; Karina W Andersen; Vibeke Andersen; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Shaji Sebastian; Luisa Barros; Fernando Magro; Jóngerð Mm Midjord; Kári R Nielsen; Riina Salupere; Hendrika Al Kievit; Gediminas Kiudelis; Juozas Kupčinskas; Mathurin Fumery; Corinne Gower-Rousseau; Ioannis P Kaimakliotis; Doron Schwartz; Selwyn Odes; Laszlo Lakatos; Peter L Lakatos; Ebbe Langholz; Pia Munkholm Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-07-26 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Christopher Ma; Carla Ascoytia; Kelly P McCarrier; Mona Martin; Brian G Feagan; Vipul Jairath Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Anna K Stuck; Martin G Täuber; Maria Schabel; Thomas Lehmann; Herbert Suter; Kathrin Mühlemann Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jan Matthys; Glyn Elwyn; Marc Van Nuland; Georges Van Maele; An De Sutter; Marc De Meyere; Myriam Deveugele Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Bernadine Dao; Thomas Douglas; Alberto Giubilini; Julian Savulescu; Michael Selgelid; Nadira S Faber Journal: AJOB Empir Bioeth Date: 2019-03-25
Authors: Olalla Vazquez-Cancela; Laura Souto-Lopez; Juan M Vazquez-Lago; Ana Lopez; Adolfo Figueiras Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240