Valerie Weber1, Alan White, Robb McIlvried. 1. Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822-1401, USA. vdweber@geisinger.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falls are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in the aging population. Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can identify at-risk patients and enable interventions to decrease risk factors for falls. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate an EMR-based intervention to reduce overall medication use, psychoactive medication use, and occurrence of falls in an ambulatory elderly population at risk for falls. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized by clinic site. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Six-hundred twenty community-dwelling patients over 70 at risk for falls based on age and medication use. INTERVENTIONS: A standardized medication review was conducted and recommendations made to the primary physician via the EMR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were contacted to obtain self reports of falls at 3-month intervals over the 15-month period of study. Fall-related diagnoses and medication data were collected through the EMR. A combination of descriptive analyses and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate differences between the 2 groups, adjusting for baseline medication patterns and comorbidities. Although the intervention did not reduce the total number of medications, there was a significant negative relationship between the intervention and the total number of medications started during the intervention period (p < .01, regression estimate -0.199) and the total number of psychoactive medications (p < .05, regression estimate -0.204.) The impact on falls was mixed; with the intervention group 0.38 times as likely to have had 1 or more fall-related diagnosis (p < .01); when data on self-reported falls was included, a nonsignificant reduction in fall risk was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that using an EMR to assess medication use in the elderly may reduce the use of psychoactive medications and falls in a community-dwelling elderly population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Falls are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in the aging population. Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can identify at-risk patients and enable interventions to decrease risk factors for falls. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate an EMR-based intervention to reduce overall medication use, psychoactive medication use, and occurrence of falls in an ambulatory elderly population at risk for falls. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized by clinic site. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Six-hundred twenty community-dwelling patients over 70 at risk for falls based on age and medication use. INTERVENTIONS: A standardized medication review was conducted and recommendations made to the primary physician via the EMR. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Patients were contacted to obtain self reports of falls at 3-month intervals over the 15-month period of study. Fall-related diagnoses and medication data were collected through the EMR. A combination of descriptive analyses and multivariate regression models were used to evaluate differences between the 2 groups, adjusting for baseline medication patterns and comorbidities. Although the intervention did not reduce the total number of medications, there was a significant negative relationship between the intervention and the total number of medications started during the intervention period (p < .01, regression estimate -0.199) and the total number of psychoactive medications (p < .05, regression estimate -0.204.) The impact on falls was mixed; with the intervention group 0.38 times as likely to have had 1 or more fall-related diagnosis (p < .01); when data on self-reported falls was included, a nonsignificant reduction in fall risk was seen. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that using an EMR to assess medication use in the elderly may reduce the use of psychoactive medications and falls in a community-dwelling elderly population.
Authors: Clemens Becker; Martina Kron; Ulrich Lindemann; Elisabeth Sturm; Barbara Eichner; Barbara Walter-Jung; Thorsten Nikolaus Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: K E Covinsky; E Kahana; B Kahana; K Kercher; J G Schumacher; A C Justice Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Terri L Blackwell; Carol M Mangione; Paula J Bowman; Mary A Whooley; Douglas C Bauer; Ann V Schwartz; Joseph T Hanlon; Michael C Nevitt Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Renée R Shield; Roberta E Goldman; David A Anthony; Nina Wang; Richard J Doyle; Jeffrey Borkan Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Thomas D Sequist; David A Cook; Jennifer S Haas; Ronnie Horner; William M Tierney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tim Johansson; Muna E Abuzahra; Sophie Keller; Eva Mann; Barbara Faller; Christina Sommerauer; Jennifer Höck; Christin Löffler; Anna Köchling; Jochen Schuler; Maria Flamm; Andreas Sönnichsen Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Andrea Bor; Mária Matuz; Márta Csatordai; Gábor Szalai; András Bálint; Ria Benkő; Gyöngyvér Soós; Péter Doró Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Christopher N Kaufmann; Adam P Spira; G Caleb Alexander; Lainie Rutkow; Ramin Mojtabai Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 2.469