Literature DB >> 18372568

Robust, comparable population metrics through collaborative photo-monitoring of whale sharks Rhincodon typus.

Jason Holmberg1, Bradley Norman, Zaven Arzoumanian.   

Abstract

The formulation of conservation policy for species that are rare and migratory requires broad cooperation to ensure that adequate levels of standardized data collection are achieved and that the results of local analyses are comparable. Estimates of apparent survival rate, relative change in abundance, and proportions of newly marked and returning individuals can inform local management decisions while highlighting corresponding changes at other linked research stations. We have applied computer-assisted photo-identification and mark-recapture population modeling to whale sharks Rhincodon typus at Ningaloo Marine Park (NMP), Western Australia, to create a baseline trend for comparison with other regional aggregations of the species. We estimate several ecological parameters of interest, including an average apparent survival rate of 0.55 yr(-1) for sharks newly marked (new) and 0.83 yr(-1) for sharks captured in multiple seasons (philopatric). The average proportion of philopatric sharks is found to be 0.65 of the total population, and we derive an average population growth rate of 1.12 yr(-1) for them. Our analysis uncovered significant heterogeneity in capture and survival probabilities in this study population; our chosen model structures and data analysis account for these influences and demonstrate a good overall fit to the time-series data. The results show good correspondence between capture probability and an available measure of recapture effort, suggesting that unmodeled systematic effects contribute insignificantly to the model fits. We find no evidence of a decline in the whale shark population at NMP, and our results provide metrics of value to their future management. Overall, our study suggests an effective approach to analyzing and modeling mark-recapture data for a rare species using computer-assisted photo-identification and opportunistic data collection from ecotourism to ensure the quality and volume of data required for population analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372568     DOI: 10.1890/07-0315.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  10 in total

1.  Multi-Year Impacts of Ecotourism on Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus) Visitation at Ningaloo Reef, Western Australia.

Authors:  R L Sanzogni; M G Meekan; J J Meeuwig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Horizontal movements, migration patterns, and population structure of whale sharks in the Gulf of Mexico and northwestern Caribbean sea.

Authors:  Robert E Hueter; John P Tyminski; Rafael de la Parra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Laser photogrammetry improves size and demographic estimates for whale sharks.

Authors:  Christoph A Rohner; Anthony J Richardson; Clare E M Prebble; Andrea D Marshall; Michael B Bennett; Scarla J Weeks; Geremy Cliff; Sabine P Wintner; Simon J Pierce
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Whale Shark (Rhincodon typus) Seasonal Occurrence, Abundance and Demographic Structure in the Mid-Equatorial Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Bruno C L Macena; Fábio H V Hazin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Long-term assessment of whale shark population demography and connectivity using photo-identification in the Western Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Jennifer A McKinney; Eric R Hoffmayer; Jason Holmberg; Rachel T Graham; William B Driggers; Rafael de la Parra-Venegas; Beatriz E Galván-Pastoriza; Steve Fox; Simon J Pierce; Alistair D M Dove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Photo-ID and telemetry highlight a global whale shark hotspot in Palawan, Philippines.

Authors:  Gonzalo Araujo; Ariana Agustines; Brian Tracey; Sally Snow; Jessica Labaja; Alessandro Ponzo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Low genetic differentiation across three major ocean populations of the whale shark, Rhincodon typus.

Authors:  Jennifer V Schmidt; Claudia L Schmidt; Fusun Ozer; Robin E Ernst; Kevin A Feldheim; Mary V Ashley; Marie Levine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.

Authors:  Brett T McClintock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Manta Matcher: automated photographic identification of manta rays using keypoint features.

Authors:  Christopher Town; Andrea Marshall; Nutthaporn Sethasathien
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Multi-method assessment of whale shark (Rhincodon typus) residency, distribution, and dispersal behavior at an aggregation site in the Red Sea.

Authors:  Jesse E M Cochran; Camrin D Braun; E Fernando Cagua; Michael F Campbell; Royale S Hardenstine; Alexander Kattan; Mark A Priest; Tane H Sinclair-Taylor; Gregory B Skomal; Sahar Sultan; Lu Sun; Simon R Thorrold; Michael L Berumen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.