Literature DB >> 18371962

A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery.

Anette Berg1, Leiv Sandvik, Anton Langebrekke, Olav Istre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare three types of equipment during hysteroscopic resection.
DESIGN: A randomized study.
SETTING: Women's clinic at Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. PATIENT(S): Two hundred premenopausal women with menorrhagia caused by dysfunctional bleedings, fibroids, or polyps. INTERVENTION(S): Hysteroscopic resection was performed either with monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% as irrigant or with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis; Olympus, Hamburg, Germany and Versapoint; Gynecare, Menlo Park, CA) using saline as irrigant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Change in serum sodium as a result of irrigant consumption, operating time, and amount of tissue removed. RESULT(S): A statistically significant reduction in mean serum sodium from 138.7 mmol/L to 133.8 mmol/L was seen in the monopolar group, compared with the case of the saline groups with no reduction. The amount of resected tissue in the monopolar and TCRis group was approximately 1.00 g/min, compared with 0.65 g/min in the Versapoint group. Loss of fluid during the procedure was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups. CONCLUSION(S): Bipolar electrodes appear to have a safer profile compared with monopolar electrodes because of the unchanged serum sodium. Irrigant consumption was significantly higher in the two bipolar groups, without any side effects during or after the procedure. Furthermore, the TCRis loop appears to be superior to the Versapoint loop, as regards operating time and amount of tissue removed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371962     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Study between Monopolar Electrodes and Bipolar Electrodes in Hysteroscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Ezzeldin Tammam; Hazem Hashim Ahmed; Ahmed Hshim Abdella; Sayed Ahmed Mohmed Taha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 2.  Advanced hysteroscopic surgery training.

Authors:  Mark M Erian; Glenda R McLaren; Anna-Marie Erian
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Sameer Umranikar; T Justin Clark; Ertan Saridogan; Dimitrios Miligkos; Kirana Arambage; Emma Torbe; Rudi Campo; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Vasilios Tanos; Grigoris Grimbizis
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-10-06

4.  A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Unipolar Versus Bipolar Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Infertile Women.

Authors:  Kallol K Roy; Sandeep Metta; Yamini Kansal; Sunesh Kumar; Seema Singhal; Perumal Vanamail
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

5.  Acute Severe Hyponatremia following Hysteroscopic Procedure in a Young Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anwar S Atieh; Omar K Abu Shamma; Mohammad O Abdelhafez; Muath A Baniowda; Samia Abed; Basheer H Babaa; Abdurrahman Hamadah; Kamel A Gharaibeh
Journal:  Case Rep Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.