| Literature DB >> 18371709 |
Sean Mason1, Rebecca Hamon, Hao Zhang, Jenny Anderson.
Abstract
The effect of potential chemical constraints on the performance of two relatively new soil P testing methods, anion exchange membrane (AEM) and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT), were evaluated. Exposures to ranges of anion (Cl(-), NO(3)(-), SO(4)(2-) and HCO(3)(-)) concentrations relevant to agricultural soils had minimal effect on P recoveries using DGT. It has also been shown previously that DGT P recoveries are unaffected by varying pH (3-9). In contrast, increasing NO(3)(-) and SO(4)(2-) concentrations in solution reduced the recovery of P using the resin method (anion exchange membrane, AEM) by 24% at 50mgL(-1) NO(3)(-) and by 47% at 12mgL(-1) SO(4)(2-) when the P concentration of the test solution was 2mgL(-1). Phosphorus sorption by the resin decreased with increasing Cl(-) concentrations until there was a 100% decrease at 300mgL(-1) Cl(-) when the P concentration of the test solution was 2mgL(-1) and a 92% reduction at 700mgL(-1) Cl(-) when the P concentration of the test solution was 0.2mgL(-1). There was also a small but significant effect of carbonate species on P sorption to the resin at carbonate concentrations that can occur in agricultural soils. Changing the pH of the solution had minimal effects on the resin P measurements in solutions above pH 4, but below pH 4, resin P measurements decreased dramatically. A poor coefficient of determination for the regression fit between DGT and resin measurements on eight agricultural soils suggested that these two methods are measuring different amounts of P for different soils. Resin P measurements increased significantly, but non-uniformly across soils, when the soil:water ratio was decreased but this did not result in an improved relationship with DGT P. There was a minimal effect on measured P using either Cl(-) or HCO(3)(-) as counter ions on the resin.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18371709 DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.07.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Talanta ISSN: 0039-9140 Impact factor: 6.057