Literature DB >> 18371466

Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for large coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: study protocol and design.

Matthias Pfisterer1, Osmund Bertel, Piero O Bonetti, Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Franz R Eberli, Paul Erne, Soeren Galatius, Burkhard Hornig, Wolfgang Kiowski, Otmar Pachinger, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Hans Rickli, Stefano De Servi, Christoph Kaiser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on a subgroup analysis of 18-month BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) outcome data, we hypothesized that very late (> 12 months) stent thrombosis occurs predominantly after drug-eluting stent implantation in large native coronary vessel stenting.
METHODS: To prove or refute this hypothesis, we set up an 11-center 4-country prospective trial of 2260 consecutive patients treated with > or = 3.0-mm stents only, randomized to receive Cypher (Johnson & Johnson, Miami Lakes, FL), Vision (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Laboratories, IL), or Xience stents (Abbott Vascular). Only patients with left main or bypass graft disease, in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis, in need of nonheart surgery, at increased bleeding risk, without compliance/consent are excluded. All patients are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months. The primary end point will be cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction after 24 months with further follow-up up to 5 years.
RESULTS: By June 12, 229 patients (10% of the planned total) were included with a baseline risk similar to that of the same subgroup of BASKET (n = 588).
CONCLUSIONS: This study will answer several important questions of contemporary stent use in patients with large native vessel stenting. The 2-year death/myocardial infarction-as well as target vessel revascularization-and bleeding rates in these patients with a first- versus second-generation drug-eluting stent should demonstrate the benefit or harm of these stents compared to cobalt-chromium bare-metal stents in this relevant, low-risk group of everyday patients. In addition, a comparison with similar BASKET patients will allow to estimate the impact of 12- versus 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy on these outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371466     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  One-year clinical follow-up of a registry evaluating a percutaneous revascularisation strategy combining a pre-specified simple selection process with the use of a new thin-strut bare cobalt-chromium stent.

Authors:  P R Stella; G Pavlakis; P Agostoni; H M Nathoe; S Hoseyni Guyomi; B J Hamer; T X Wildbergh; P A Doevendans; E Van Belle
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 2.  Implementation of standardized assessment and reporting of myocardial infarction in contemporary randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sergio Leonardi; Paul W Armstrong; Phillip J Schulte; E Magnus Ohman; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Drug-eluting stents in large coronary vessels improve both safety and efficacy compared with bare-metal stents in women: a pooled analysis of the BASKET-PROVE I and II trials.

Authors:  Louise Hougesen Bjerking; Kim Wadt Hansen; Rikke Sørensen; Eva Prescott; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Raban Jeger; Christoph Kaiser; Matthias Pfisterer; Søren Galatius
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  Do ultrathin strut bare-metal stents with passive coating improve efficacy in large coronary arteries? Insights from the randomized, multicenter BASKET-PROVE trials.

Authors:  Kim Wadt Hansen; Raban Jeger; Rikke Sørensen; Christoph Kaiser; Matthias Pfisterer; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Louise Hougesen Bjerking; Søren Galatius
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.298

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.