Literature DB >> 18371416

Challenges to human embryonic stem cell patents.

Aurora Plomer1, Kenneth S Taymor, Christopher Thomas Scott.   

Abstract

The patenting of human embryonic stem (hES) cells has produced one of the most unusual and fraught situations in the history of science, ethics, and law. This Commentary examines legal and moral challenges to three foundational patents held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF). We conclude that, in the United States, technical challenges may, paradoxically, produce a stronger patent position for WARF. In the European Union, moral challenges mean confusion for member states. We demonstrate that hES cell intellectual property will be guided and bound by a welter of moral, technical, and legal inputs, with discrete national and jurisdictional dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371416     DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stem Cell        ISSN: 1875-9777            Impact factor:   24.633


  3 in total

1.  Defining "research" in the US and EU: contrast of Sherley v. Sebelius and Brüstle v. Greenpeace rulings.

Authors:  Maude L Cuchiara; James Lawford Davies; Kirstin R W Matthews
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  From strict moral standards to ethical neutrality: a policy-guided shift in the patentability of human embryonic stem cells in China.

Authors:  Xuekai Xie; Jiajv Chen; Zhengyang Shu
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Patents on Technologies of Human Tissue and Organ Regeneration from Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Xuejun H Parsons; Yang D Teng; Dennis A Moore; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Recent Pat Regen Med       Date:  2011
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.