BACKGROUND: 24-h urine measurements are used in the routine diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases in the clinical laboratory. Calcium (Ca(2+)), magnesium (Mg(2+)), phosphate (PO(4)(3-)) and uric acid are frequently requested markers in 24-h urine samples. Because of the different solubilities of these parameters, different urine collection conditions - urine in base for uric acid and urine in acid for Ca(2+), PO(4)(3-) and Mg(2+) measurements - are recommended. METHODS: We aimed to test the effect of addition of preservatives and heating of the urine specimen on the results obtained for Ca(2+), Mg(2+), PO(4)(3-) and uric acid by comparison with untreated samples results. Spot (n=20) and 24-h urine (n=50) samples were obtained from patients for routine urine analysis. A single spot urine sample was divided into five aliquots of 10 mL each: one containing 200 microL of HCl (6 N), another containing 200 microL of sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO(3) (5 g/L), two others in which the same preservative agents were added 24 h after the collection, and one without any preservative (untreated). Ca(2+), PO(4)(3-), uric acid and Mg(2+) were measured in triplicate and at three different time points during the study: at the time of sampling (0 h), 24 h after sampling, and after heating the samples. The 24-h urine samples were collected without preservatives and analytes were measured promptly before and after acidification/alkalinization. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between untreated and treated samples (p>0.05). Heating also failed to show any difference in the results (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: According to our results, addition of preservatives is not necessary for measurement of Ca(2+), Mg(2+), PO(4)(3-) and uric acid in promptly assayed 24-h urine samples.
BACKGROUND: 24-h urine measurements are used in the routine diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases in the clinical laboratory. Calcium (Ca(2+)), magnesium (Mg(2+)), phosphate (PO(4)(3-)) and uric acid are frequently requested markers in 24-h urine samples. Because of the different solubilities of these parameters, different urine collection conditions - urine in base for uric acid and urine in acid for Ca(2+), PO(4)(3-) and Mg(2+) measurements - are recommended. METHODS: We aimed to test the effect of addition of preservatives and heating of the urine specimen on the results obtained for Ca(2+), Mg(2+), PO(4)(3-) and uric acid by comparison with untreated samples results. Spot (n=20) and 24-h urine (n=50) samples were obtained from patients for routine urine analysis. A single spot urine sample was divided into five aliquots of 10 mL each: one containing 200 microL of HCl (6 N), another containing 200 microL of sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO(3) (5 g/L), two others in which the same preservative agents were added 24 h after the collection, and one without any preservative (untreated). Ca(2+), PO(4)(3-), uric acid and Mg(2+) were measured in triplicate and at three different time points during the study: at the time of sampling (0 h), 24 h after sampling, and after heating the samples. The 24-h urine samples were collected without preservatives and analytes were measured promptly before and after acidification/alkalinization. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between untreated and treated samples (p>0.05). Heating also failed to show any difference in the results (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: According to our results, addition of preservatives is not necessary for measurement of Ca(2+), Mg(2+), PO(4)(3-) and uric acid in promptly assayed 24-h urine samples.
Authors: James C Williams; Giovanni Gambaro; Allen Rodgers; John Asplin; Olivier Bonny; Antonia Costa-Bauzá; Pietro Manuel Ferraro; Giovanni Fogazzi; Daniel G Fuster; David S Goldfarb; Félix Grases; Ita P Heilberg; Dik Kok; Emmanuel Letavernier; Giuseppe Lippi; Martino Marangella; Antonio Nouvenne; Michele Petrarulo; Roswitha Siener; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Olivier Traxer; Alberto Trinchieri; Emanuele Croppi; William G Robertson Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.436