Literature DB >> 18371094

Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla.

Kerstin Fischer1, Torsten Stenberg, Måns Hedin, Lars Sennerby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The overall aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of early and delayed implant loading in the totally edentulous maxilla during 5 years of function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with edentulous maxillae were randomized in two groups and subjected to early (test, n=16) or delayed (control, n=8) loading. A total of 142 implants were placed and 139 implants (Straumann AG) were loaded with full-arch bridges and followed for 5 years.
RESULTS: All patients received and maintained a fixed bridge throughout the study period. Five (5.3%) test implants in three patients and two (4.3%) control implants in two patients were lost during the 5 years (NS). There were no differences in implant stability as measured with resonance frequency analysis at 5 years. More bone loss occurred at test than at control implants, -0.8 mm (SD 1.2) vs. -0.3 mm (SD 1.1), respectively. However, test implants showed a more coronal marginal bone level than control implants after 5 years, 2.9 mm (SD 1.1) vs. 3.7 mm (SD 1.2) from the implant shoulder, respectively. No control implants and four (4.4%) test implants in three (18.8%) patients showed >3 mm bone loss after 5 years. Two of the latter implants in one patient also showed increased probing depths, bleeding at probing and plaque accumulation. Tooth fracture was the most common prosthetic complication. The use of lingual gold onlay effectively reduced the number of resin-related complications as opposed to a resilient mouth guard.
CONCLUSIONS: The present randomized controlled trial showed no important differences between early and delayed loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla after 5 years of function. A favourable long-term marginal bone response to the sandblasted large-grit acid-etched (SLA) surface was observed. Technical complications were mainly resin-related which could be avoided by the use of a lingual gold onlay. It is concluded that early loading of SLA-surface implants for support of full-arch bridges represents a viable therapy for the totally edentulous maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371094     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Hassan Maghaireh; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-03-28

2.  Does the number of implants have any relation with peri-implant disease?

Authors:  Bernardo Born Passoni; Haline Renata Dalago; Guenther Schuldt Filho; João Gustavo Oliveira de Souza; César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti; Ricardo de Souza Magini; Marco Aurélio Bianchini
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Bone cement grafting increases implant primary stability in circumferential cortical bone defects.

Authors:  Seung-Yun Shin; Seung-Il Shin; Seung-Beom Kye; Seok-Woo Chang; Jongrak Hong; Jun-Young Paeng; Seung-Min Yang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  A randomized clinical study to compare implant stability and bone loss using early loading protocol in two implant systems with different design.

Authors:  Rani Ranabhatt; Kamleshwar Singh; Ramashanker Siddharth; Shuchi Tripathi; Deeksha Arya
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Immediate loading implants: review of the critical aspects.

Authors:  L Tettamanti; C Andrisani; M Andreasi Bassi; R Vinci; J Silvestre-Rangil; A Tagliabue
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-09-27

6.  Clinical efficacy of early loading versus conventional loading of dental implants.

Authors:  Yanfei Zhu; Xinyi Zheng; Guanqi Zeng; Yi Xu; Xinhua Qu; Min Zhu; Eryi Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Influence of Custom-Milled Framework Design for an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 3D-FEA Sudy.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Roberto Lo Giudice; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Marco Antonio Bottino; Ettore Epifania; Pietro Ausiello
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Satisfaction level in dental-phobic patients with implant-supported rehabilitation performed under general anaesthesia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Louise Sidenö; Rim Hmaidouch; Jan Brandt; Nadine von Krockow; Paul Weigl
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Assessment of Survival Rate of Dental Implants in Patients with Bruxism: A 5-year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Rajkiran Chitumalla; K V Halini Kumari; Abhilash Mohapatra; Anuj Singh Parihar; K S Anand; Padmavathi Katragadda
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018-09

10.  Six-year clinical outcomes of implant-supported acrylic vs. ceramic superstructures according to the All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla.

Authors:  Mustafa Ayna; Fatih Karayürek; Søren Jepsen; Marie Emmert; Yahya Acil; Jörg Wiltfang; Aydin Gülses
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.634

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.