Literature DB >> 18371016

Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable?

M Scandura1, L Iacolina, B Crestanello, E Pecchioli, M F Di Benedetto, V Russo, R Davoli, M Apollonio, G Bertorelle.   

Abstract

The European wild boar is an important game species, subjected to local extinctions and translocations in the past, and currently enormously and worryingly expanding in some areas where management is urgently required. Understanding the relative roles of ancient and recent events in shaping the genetic structure of this species is therefore not only an interesting scientific issue, but it represents also the basis for addressing future management strategies. In addition, several pig breeds descend from the European wild boar, but the geographical location of the domestication area(s) and the possible introgression of pig genomes into wild populations are still open questions. Here, we analysed the genetic variation in different wild boar populations in Europe. Ten polymorphic microsatellites were typed in 252 wild boars and the mtDNA control region was sequenced in a subset of 145 individuals. Some samples from different pig breeds were also analysed. Our results, which were obtained considering also 612 published mtDNA sequences, suggest that (i) most populations are similarly differentiated, but the major discontinuity is found along the Alps; (ii) except for the Italian populations, European wild boars show the signature of a postglacial demographic expansion; (iii) Italian populations seem to preserve a high proportion of preglaciation diversity; (iv) the demographic decline which occurred in some areas in the last few centuries did not produce a noticeable reduction of genetic variation; (v) signs of human-mediated gene flow among populations are weak, although in some regions the effects of translocations are detectable and a low degree of pig introgression can be identified; (vi) the hypothesis of an independent domestication centre in Italy is not supported by our data, which in turn confirm that Central European wild boar might have represented an important source for domestic breeds. We can therefore conclude that recent human activities had a limited effect on the wild boar genetic structure. It follows that areas with high variation and differentiation represent natural reservoirs of genetic diversity to be protected avoiding translocations. In this context controlling some populations by hunting is not expected to affect significantly genetic variation in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371016     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03703.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  43 in total

1.  Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.

Authors:  N Veličković; E Ferreira; M Djan; M Ernst; D Obreht Vidaković; A Monaco; C Fonseca
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic Structure and Effective Population Sizes in European Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) at a Continental Scale: Insights from Microsatellite DNA.

Authors:  Frank E Zachos; Alain C Frantz; Ralph Kuehn; Sabine Bertouille; Marc Colyn; Magdalena Niedziałkowska; Javier Pérez-González; Anna Skog; Nikica Sprĕm; Marie-Christine Flamand
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Domestication does not narrow MHC diversity in Sus scrofa.

Authors:  Katerina A Moutou; Evagelia A Koutsogiannouli; Costas Stamatis; Charalambos Billinis; Claudia Kalbe; Massimo Scandura; Zissis Mamuris
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Effects of human perturbation on the genetic make-up of an island population: the case of the Sardinian wild boar.

Authors:  M Scandura; L Iacolina; A Cossu; M Apollonio
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Like a pig out of water: seaborne spread of domestic pigs in Southern Italy and Sardinia during the Bronze and Iron Ages.

Authors:  C Lega; D Fulgione; A Genovese; L Rook; M Masseti; M Meiri; A Cinzia Marra; F Carotenuto; P Raia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Complete mitochondrial genome phylogeographic analysis of killer whales (Orcinus orca) indicates multiple species.

Authors:  Phillip A Morin; Frederick I Archer; Andrew D Foote; Julia Vilstrup; Eric E Allen; Paul Wade; John Durban; Kim Parsons; Robert Pitman; Lewyn Li; Pascal Bouffard; Sandra C Abel Nielsen; Morten Rasmussen; Eske Willerslev; M Thomas P Gilbert; Timothy Harkins
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Duplication polymorphism at MHC class II DRB1 locus in the wild boar (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Federica Barbisan; Claudia Savio; Giorgio Bertorelle; Tomaso Patarnello; Leonardo Congiu
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.846

8.  How immunogenetically different are domestic pigs from wild boars: a perspective from single-nucleotide polymorphisms of 19 immunity-related candidate genes.

Authors:  Shanyuan Chen; Rui Gomes; Vânia Costa; Pedro Santos; Rui Charneca; Ya-ping Zhang; Xue-hong Liu; Shao-qing Wang; Pedro Bento; Jose-Luis Nunes; József Buzgó; Gyula Varga; István Anton; Attila Zsolnai; Albano Beja-Pereira
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.846

Review 9.  Mining the pig genome to investigate the domestication process.

Authors:  S E Ramos-Onsins; W Burgos-Paz; A Manunza; M Amills
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Clear phylogeographic pattern and genetic structure of wild boar Sus scrofa population in Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Magdalena Niedziałkowska; Ewa Tarnowska; Joanna Ligmanowska; Bogumiła Jędrzejewska; Tomasz Podgórski; Anna Radziszewska; Iwona Ratajczyk; Szilvia Kusza; Aleksei N Bunevich; Gabriel Danila; Maryna Shkvyria; Tomasz Grzybowski; Marcin Woźniak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.