Literature DB >> 18370558

Postoperative sedation with propofol infusion: haemodynamics and pharmacokinetics.

C Sorbara1, G Armellin, R Bonato, L Callegher, G Giron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the haemodynamic response and pharmacokinetics of a low-dose propofol continuous infusion in providing sedation in patients who required mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. PATIENTS: 22 male patients, aged between 45 and 65 years, were evaluated in an open, uncontrolled study.
INTERVENTIONS: At the end of the surgical procedure, a low-dose (1 mg/kg/h) propofol infusion was started and adjusted to optimise sedation according to the Ramsay scale. The mean propofol infusion rate was 1.42 +/- 0.4 mg/kg/h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrocardiogram, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressure, and central venous pressure were monitored continuously. Left ventricular shortening fraction was calculated by transoesophageal echocardiography. Propofol plasma levels were calculated in 10 patients to evaluate the pharmacokinetics.
RESULTS: Throughout the duration of the study all patients were haemodynamically stable. Sedation was maintained for 363 +/- 244 minutes and was adequate in all patients. The clinical recovery time (postsedation responsiveness) was 15.7 +/- 6.2 minutes, after infusion suspension. There was no correlation between propofol plasma levels or propofol infusion rate and the depth of sedation (respectively, r = 0.39 and r = 0.23), while there was a good correlation (r = 0.62) between propofol infusion rate and plasma levels. Open two-compartment model pharmacokinetics were demonstrated.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose propofol infusion (1 to 2 mg/kg/h) proved to be well tolerated and effective in maintaining sedation after cardiac surgery. Sedation was quickly obtained without a propofol loading dose; steady-state plasma concentrations of 0.6 to 0.8 mg/L were rapidly achieved. Propofol pharmacokinetics ensure rapid clearance with rapid clinical recovery.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18370558     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199816060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  24 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and cardiodynamic effects of propofol and etomidate: negative inotropic properties of propofol.

Authors:  T Brüssel; J L Theissen; G Vigfusson; P P Lunkenheimer; H Van Aken; P Lawin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil. The influence of age and weight.

Authors:  P Hilton; V J Dev; E Major
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Heart rate after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  K E Airaksinen; M J Ikäheimo; J T Takkunen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Improved method for the determination of propofol in blood by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

Authors:  G F Plummer
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1987-10-09

5.  Propofol sedation after open heart surgery. A clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  T J McMurray; P S Collier; I W Carson; S M Lyons; P Elliott
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Does perioperative myocardial ischemia lead to postoperative myocardial infarction?

Authors:  S Slogoff; A S Keats
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Propofol produces endothelium-independent vasodilation and may act as a Ca2+ channel blocker.

Authors:  K S Chang; R F Davis
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Hemodynamic effects of infusions of the emulsion formulation of propofol during nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans.

Authors:  D P Coates; C R Monk; C Prys-Roberts; M Turtle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 9.  Pro: early endotracheal extubation is preferable to late extubation in patients following coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  T L Higgins
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Propofol versus midazolam for intensive care unit sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  T L Higgins; J P Yared; F G Estafanous; J P Coyle; H K Ko; D B Goodale
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.