OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a new multidose powder inhaler (MDPI) [Easyhaler((R)), Orion Pharma, Finland] containing a high dose (500 microg/dose) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were compared with those of BDP metered dose inhaler administered with a large volume spacer (MDI-spacer). PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN:Recruited patients were adult asthmatics currently receiving 800 to 1000 microg/day ofinhaled corticosteroid. The dose of BDP during the study was 1000 mg/day. The study was an open, randomised, parallel-group multicentre study and included a 2-week run-in period followed by a 12-week treatment period. RESULTS:74 patients were randomised to both groups. During the run-in period the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 489 and 478 L/min in the MDPI and MDI-spacer groups, respectively. During the last 2 weeks of the study the morning PEF was 485 L/min in the MDPI group and 477 L/min in the MDI-spacer group. Asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication were low in both groups. The median dose of histamine required to decrease forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) by 15% was 1.05mg in the MDPI group and 0.64mg in the MDI-spacer group. The most frequent adverse events were hoarseness and sore throat. Mean serum cortisol levels were not affected in either treatment group. Patients' personal opinion regarding acceptability of the devices clearly favoured the MDPI. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the novel powder inhaler was well tolerated and at least equally effective compared with the conventional MDI-spacer combination in the treatment of asthma with BDP. However, in everyday use the patients clearly favoured the powder inhaler.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a new multidose powder inhaler (MDPI) [Easyhaler((R)), Orion Pharma, Finland] containing a high dose (500 microg/dose) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) were compared with those of BDP metered dose inhaler administered with a large volume spacer (MDI-spacer). PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: Recruited patients were adult asthmatics currently receiving 800 to 1000 microg/day of inhaled corticosteroid. The dose of BDP during the study was 1000 mg/day. The study was an open, randomised, parallel-group multicentre study and included a 2-week run-in period followed by a 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: 74 patients were randomised to both groups. During the run-in period the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 489 and 478 L/min in the MDPI and MDI-spacer groups, respectively. During the last 2 weeks of the study the morning PEF was 485 L/min in the MDPI group and 477 L/min in the MDI-spacer group. Asthma symptom scores and use of rescue medication were low in both groups. The median dose of histamine required to decrease forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) by 15% was 1.05mg in the MDPI group and 0.64mg in the MDI-spacer group. The most frequent adverse events were hoarseness and sore throat. Mean serum cortisol levels were not affected in either treatment group. Patients' personal opinion regarding acceptability of the devices clearly favoured the MDPI. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the novel powder inhaler was well tolerated and at least equally effective compared with the conventional MDI-spacer combination in the treatment of asthma with BDP. However, in everyday use the patients clearly favoured the powder inhaler.