Literature DB >> 18370502

Efficacy of spiramycin as an alternative to amoxicillin in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections.

C Bunnag1, P Jareoncharsri, S Voraprayoon, A Vitavasiri, P Supatchaipisit, S Kongpatanakul.   

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of spiramycin with that of amoxicillin in treating patients with acute community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). The study was an open, randomised, comparative parallel design and patients received either spiramycin 3 MIU (2 tablets, 500mg or 1.5 MIU per tablet) twice daily after meals, i.e. 6 MIU/day for 7 days or amoxicillin (500 mg/capsule) 1 capsule three times daily after meals, i.e. 1500 mg/day for 7 days. Patients attending the ENT outpatient clinic at Siriraj Hospital in Bangkok for treatment of acute URTIs were included in the study after giving their informed consent. Eligible patients comprised those aged 18 years and over, of either gender, who had at least two of the following symptoms: fever (>/=38 degrees C oral), nasal discharge/obstruction, sore throat, cough and/or hoarseness of voice that did not require parenteral drug therapy or hospitalisation. A total of 99 patients were included in this study, 49 patients received spiramycin and 50 received amoxicillin. Of the 45 assessed patients treated with spiramycin, 40 were judged by the investigators as a 'success' (89%), and five were judged a 'non-success' (11%), compared with 48 assessed patients in the amoxicillin group where 40 patients were classified as a 'success' (83.3%) and 8 were judged a 'non-success' (16.7%). No statistically significant differences between treatments were demonstrated regarding the overall efficacy of treatment. This study demonstrated that the prescribed regimens of spiramycin and amoxicillin were similarly effective in the treatment of adult acute URTIs. The tolerability of both drugs was also similar. Furthermore, it was noted that the convenient twice-daily dosage regimen of spiramycin may allow better patient compliance.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18370502     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199815060-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of acute pharyngitis].

Authors:  P Chavanet; H Portier
Journal:  Rev Prat       Date:  1992-02-01

2.  Evaluation of spiramycin as a therapeutic agent for elimination of nasopharyngeal pathogens. Possible use of spiramycin for middle ear infections and for gonococcal and meningococcal nasopharyngeal carriage.

Authors:  C Kamme; G Kahlmeter; A Melander
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1978

3.  Comparative in vitro activities of four macrolides: josamycin, erythromycin, spiramycin and roxithromycin, against 424 anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  M Derriennic; L Dubreuil; A E Reynaud; A L Courtieu
Journal:  Chemioterapia       Date:  1987-06

Review 4.  Spiramycin concentrations in the human respiratory tract: a review.

Authors:  E Bergogne-Bérézin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Spiramycin versus penicillin V in the empiric treatment of bacterial tonsillitis.

Authors:  L Manolopoulos; C Adamopoulos; A Tzagaroulakis; P Maragoudakis; T Kaffes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1989-03

6.  Sub-inhibitory and post-antibiotic effects of spiramycin and erythromycin on Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Webster; K Ghazanfar; R Slack
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline in the empirical treatment of acute sinusitis: preliminary results.

Authors:  A J Boezeman; A M Kayser; R J Siemelink
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  [Spiramycin ; therapeutic value in humans. (author's transl)].

Authors:  S Kernbaum
Journal:  Sem Hop       Date:  1982-02-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.