Literature DB >> 18370472

Cefprozil versus Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Acute Sinusitis.

E R Brankston1, H S Conter, R Corriveau, J M Martel, C Laroche, R Roy, C Savard, D Roy, R Kelly, P Forget, M Rivard, F Boulerice.   

Abstract

The objective of this multicentre, randomised, open-label, general practice (GP) study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cefprozil (Cefzil(trade mark), Bristol-Myers Squibb) compared with that of cefuroxime axetil (Ceftin((R)), Glaxo Wellcome) in the treatment of adult subjects with acute sinusitis. Typical of the GP setting, diagnosis was made based solely on clinical signs and symptoms of acute disease. Sinus radiography was performed post-randomisation. A total of 381 adolescent and adult patients were randomly assigned to 10 days' treatment with either cefprozil, 500mg orally twice daily (n = 191), or cefuroxime axetil, 250mg orally twice daily (n = 190). Based on predefined criteria, treatments were found to be equally effective in terms of proportions of patients in the per-protocol population that were cured, improved or failed (p = 0.20). Similar results were observed when the evaluation was performed on the subset of patients with radiographic evidence of sinusitis and when the evaluation was based on the investigator's judgement. Similar rates of adverse events were observed in the two treatment groups. In summary, cefprozil 500mg twice daily is as well tolerated and as effective as cefuroxime axetil 250mg twice daily for the treatment of adolescent and adult patients with clinical signs and symptoms of acute sinusitis.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18370472     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199815020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  40 in total

1.  Paranasal sinus imaging.

Authors:  S J Zinreich
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  A practical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis.

Authors:  D E Low; M Desrosiers; J McSherry; G Garber; J W Williams; H Remy; R S Fenton; V Forte; M Balter; C Rotstein; C Craft; J Dubois; G Harding; M Schloss; M Miller; R A McIvor; R J Davidson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Etiology and antimicrobial therapy of acute maxillary sinusitis.

Authors:  B H Hamory; M A Sande; A Sydnor; D L Seale; J M Gwaltney
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Analysis of symptoms and clinical signs in the maxillary sinus empyema.

Authors:  O Berg; C Carenfelt
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Sinusitis as an emergency.

Authors:  C T Yarington
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Etiology and antimicrobial treatment of acute sinusitis.

Authors:  J M Gwaltney; A Sydnor; M A Sande
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1981 May-Jun

Review 7.  Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil.

Authors:  S L Barriere
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Comparative evaluation of cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor for treatment of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.

Authors:  A Sydnor; J M Gwaltney; D M Cocchetto; W M Scheld
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-12

Review 9.  Complications of bacterial infection of the ears, paranasal sinuses, and oropharynx in adults.

Authors:  P G Ramsey; E A Weymuller
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  The incidence and aetiology of respiratory tract infections in general practice--with emphasis on Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Authors:  P A Mardh; B Hovelius; E Nordenfelt; R Rosenberg; L V Soltesz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.553

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  L J Scott; D Ormrod; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.