PURPOSE: alphavbeta3 integrins are important cell adhesion receptors involved in angiogenic processes. Recently, we demonstrated using [(18)F]Galacto-RGD that monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression is feasible. Here, we introduce (68)Ga- and (111)In-labelled derivatives and compare them with [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. METHODS: For radiolabelling, cyclo(RGDfK(DOTA)) was synthesised using SPPS. For in vitro characterisation determination of partition coefficients, protein binding, metabolic stability, alphavbeta3 affinity and cell uptake and for in vivo characterization, biodistribution studies and micro positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were carried out. For in vivo and in vitro studies, human melanoma M21 (alphavbeta3 positive) and M21-L (alphavbeta3 negative) cells were used. RESULTS: Both tracers can be synthesised straightforward. The compounds showed hydrophilic properties and high metabolic stability. Up to 23% protein-bound activity for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD and only up to 1.4% for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD was found. Cell uptake studies indicate receptor-specific accumulation. This is confirmed by the biodistribution data. One hour p.i. accumulation in alphavbeta3-positive tumours was 2.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and in alphavbeta3-negative tumours 0.8 +/- 0.1%ID/g for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD ([(111)In]DOTA-RGD: 1.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and 0.5 +/- 0.2%ID/g; [(18)F]Galacto-RGD: 1.6 +/- 0.2%ID/g and 0.4 +/- 0.1%ID/g). Thus, tumour uptake ratios were comparable. Due to approx. 3-fold higher blood pool activities for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD, tumour/blood ratios were higher for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD and [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. However, microPET studies demonstrated that visualisation of alphavbeta3-positive tumours using [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD is possible. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD allows monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression. Especially, the much easier radiosynthesis compared to [(18)F]Galacto-RGD would make it an attractive alternative. However, due to higher blood pool activity, [(18)F]Galacto-RGD remains superior for imaging alphavbeta3 expression. Introduction of alternative chelator systems may overcome the disadvantages.
PURPOSE: alphavbeta3 integrins are important cell adhesion receptors involved in angiogenic processes. Recently, we demonstrated using [(18)F]Galacto-RGD that monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression is feasible. Here, we introduce (68)Ga- and (111)In-labelled derivatives and compare them with [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. METHODS: For radiolabelling, cyclo(RGDfK(DOTA)) was synthesised using SPPS. For in vitro characterisation determination of partition coefficients, protein binding, metabolic stability, alphavbeta3 affinity and cell uptake and for in vivo characterization, biodistribution studies and micro positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were carried out. For in vivo and in vitro studies, humanmelanoma M21 (alphavbeta3 positive) and M21-L (alphavbeta3 negative) cells were used. RESULTS: Both tracers can be synthesised straightforward. The compounds showed hydrophilic properties and high metabolic stability. Up to 23% protein-bound activity for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD and only up to 1.4% for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD was found. Cell uptake studies indicate receptor-specific accumulation. This is confirmed by the biodistribution data. One hour p.i. accumulation in alphavbeta3-positive tumours was 2.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and in alphavbeta3-negative tumours 0.8 +/- 0.1%ID/g for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD ([(111)In]DOTA-RGD: 1.9 +/- 0.3%ID/g and 0.5 +/- 0.2%ID/g; [(18)F]Galacto-RGD: 1.6 +/- 0.2%ID/g and 0.4 +/- 0.1%ID/g). Thus, tumour uptake ratios were comparable. Due to approx. 3-fold higher blood pool activities for [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD, tumour/blood ratios were higher for [(111)In]DOTA-RGD and [(18)F]Galacto-RGD. However, microPET studies demonstrated that visualisation of alphavbeta3-positive tumours using [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD is possible. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that [(68)Ga]DOTA-RGD allows monitoring of alphavbeta3 expression. Especially, the much easier radiosynthesis compared to [(18)F]Galacto-RGD would make it an attractive alternative. However, due to higher blood pool activity, [(18)F]Galacto-RGD remains superior for imaging alphavbeta3 expression. Introduction of alternative chelator systems may overcome the disadvantages.
Authors: Wouter A P Breeman; Marion de Jong; Erik de Blois; Bert F Bernard; Mark Konijnenberg; Eric P Krenning Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ambros J Beer; Roland Haubner; Mario Sarbia; Michael Goebel; Stephan Luderschmidt; Anca Ligia Grosu; Oliver Schnell; Markus Niemeyer; Horst Kessler; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Wolfgang A Weber; Markus Schwaiger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: G G Bishop; J A McPherson; J M Sanders; S E Hesselbacher; M J Feldman; C A McNamara; L W Gimple; E R Powers; S A Mousa; I J Sarembock Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-04-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roland Haubner; Bertrand Kuhnast; Christian Mang; Wolfgang A Weber; Horst Kessler; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Markus Schwaiger Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Clemens Decristoforo; Roger Knopp; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Marco Rupprich; Thorsten Dreger; Andre Hess; Irene Virgolini; Roland Haubner Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Roland Haubner; Wolfgang A Weber; Ambros J Beer; Eugenija Vabuliene; Daniel Reim; Mario Sarbia; Karl-Friedrich Becker; Michael Goebel; Rüdiger Hein; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Horst Kessler; Markus Schwaiger Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2005-03-29 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Peter A Knetsch; Milos Petrik; Christoph M Griessinger; Christine Rangger; Melpomeni Fani; Christian Kesenheimer; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Bernd J Pichler; Irene Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo; Roland Haubner Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Christine Rangger; Jane Sosabowski; Peter Laverman; Jean-Claude Reubi; Irene Johanna Virgolini; Clemens Decristoforo Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Gang Ren; Zhe Liu; Zheng Miao; Hongguang Liu; Murugesan Subbarayan; Frederick T Chin; Lan Zhang; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Zhen Cheng Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 10.057