OBJECTIVE: To determine if the implementation of Lean methods resulted in improved Pap test quality and diagnostic accuracy in 5 clinician practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 1-year case-control study that included 5,384 control (preintervention) and 5,442 case (postintervention) women who had a Pap test procured by 1 of 5 clinicians. Using Lean methods, the clinicians increased their focus of Pap test procurement by creating a "one-by-one" workflow and recorded process completion using a Lean checklist. We compared the case and control Pap test quality and accuracy measures using the proportion of Pap tests lacking a transformation zone component, proportion of unsatisfactory Pap tests, frequency of newly detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following a previous benign Pap test, and proportion of Pap tests with a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance. RESULTS: After the intervention, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean proportion of Pap tests lacking a transformation zone component, p =.011. Two of 5 clinicians showed a statistically significant decrease in their unsatisfactory Pap test frequency, although the overall Pap test unsatisfactory frequency for the case group was not statistically significant lower, p =.087. The case group showed a 114% increase in newly detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following a previous benign Pap test, p =.004. There was no statistically significant difference for the proportion of Pap tests with a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance, p =.908. CONCLUSIONS: Disseminating Lean methods across a group of clinicians resulted in improved Pap test quality and diagnostic accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the implementation of Lean methods resulted in improved Pap test quality and diagnostic accuracy in 5 clinician practices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 1-year case-control study that included 5,384 control (preintervention) and 5,442 case (postintervention) women who had a Pap test procured by 1 of 5 clinicians. Using Lean methods, the clinicians increased their focus of Pap test procurement by creating a "one-by-one" workflow and recorded process completion using a Lean checklist. We compared the case and control Pap test quality and accuracy measures using the proportion of Pap tests lacking a transformation zone component, proportion of unsatisfactory Pap tests, frequency of newly detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following a previous benign Pap test, and proportion of Pap tests with a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance. RESULTS: After the intervention, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean proportion of Pap tests lacking a transformation zone component, p =.011. Two of 5 clinicians showed a statistically significant decrease in their unsatisfactory Pap test frequency, although the overall Pap test unsatisfactory frequency for the case group was not statistically significant lower, p =.087. The case group showed a 114% increase in newly detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following a previous benign Pap test, p =.004. There was no statistically significant difference for the proportion of Pap tests with a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance, p =.908. CONCLUSIONS: Disseminating Lean methods across a group of clinicians resulted in improved Pap test quality and diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Shin-Ping Tu; Sherry Feng; Richard Storch; Mei-Po Yip; HeeYon Sohng; Mingang Fu; Alan Chun Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2012-11