Literature DB >> 18369299

Cervical cytology specimen adequacy: patient management guidelines and optimizing specimen collection.

Diane Davis Davey1, J Thomas Cox, R Marshall Austin, George Birdsong, Terence J Colgan, Lydia P Howell, Mujtaba Husain, Teresa M Darragh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide updated management guidelines according to cervical cytology specimen adequacy and techniques to optimize adequacy based on literature review and expert opinion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selected members of the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology committee and invited experts conducted a literature review and discussed appropriate management and areas for future research emphasis.
RESULTS: The guidelines recommend a repeat Pap test in a short interval of 2 to 4 months for most women when the cytology result is unsatisfactory. The preferred follow-up for women with a negative cytology result lacking an endocervical/transformation zone component or showing other quality indicators is a repeat Pap test in 12 months. Indications for an early repeat Pap test in 6 months are provided, and the influence of human papillomavirus testing results on management is discussed. Techniques for optimizing specimen adequacy are provided in detail.
CONCLUSION: The specimen adequacy management guidelines will help promote uniform and optimal follow-up of patients receiving cervical cytology screening. The topics for future research emphasis will be helpful in promoting studies in needed areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18369299     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181585b9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of DNA ploidy to cervical cancer screening: A review.

Authors:  David Garner
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

2.  Improving sensitivity of cervical cytology by removal of cervical secretions before sampling: a prospective study in Mexico.

Authors:  J J Curiel-Valdés; J Briones-Pimentel; C Bandala
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional Pap smears and liquid-based cytology: data from two randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  P E Castle; J Bulten; M Confortini; P Klinkhamer; A Pellegrini; A G Siebers; G Ronco; M Arbyn
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  The use of biomarkers and HPV genotyping to improve diagnostic accuracy in women with a transformation zone type 3.

Authors:  Kristyn Manley; Amit Patel; Joya Pawade; Susan Glew; Katherine Hunt; Nichole Villeneuve; Pinias Mukonoweshuro; Samantha Thompson; Helen Hoskins; Andres López-Bernal; Andrew Wills
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Screening adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Lori A Boardman; Katina Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Predictors of Unsatisfactory Conventional Pap Smears.

Authors:  Reetika Sharma; Marie Moses Ambroise; Anita Ramdas; Kandasamy Ravichandran
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Cervical and anal HPV infection: cytological and histological abnormalities in HIV-infected women in Thailand.

Authors:  Reshmie A Ramautarsing; Nittaya Phanuphak; Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana; Ferdinand Wnm Wit; Nipat Teeratakulpisarn; Tippawan Pankam; Piyanee Rodbamrung; Janneke H Wijgert; Joep Ma Lange; Praphan Phanuphak; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Stephen Kerr; Jintanat Ananworanich
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Improving the Accuracy of a Clinical Decision Support System for Cervical Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  K E Ravikumar; Kathy L MacLaughlin; Marianne R Scheitel; Maya Kessler; Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Hongfang Liu; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Collection of the BD SurePath Pap Test with a broom device plus endocervical brush improves disease detection when compared to the broom device alone or the spatula plus endocervical brush combination.

Authors:  Sharon Davis-Devine; Sarah J Day; Amy Anderson; Ashley French; Darcy Madison-Henness; Naomi Mohar; Danielle Tansy; Adarsh Hiremath; Jeffrey A Douglas; Gregory G Freund
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Updates of the current screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jin Hwa Hong; Jae Kwan Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.