Literature DB >> 18368645

Gender differences in FOBT use: evidence from a large German survey.

M Sieverding1, U Matterne, L Ciccarello.   

Abstract

We examined prevalence and correlates of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) uptake in a sample of men and women aged 50 to 70 years without a personal history of cancer (n=15,810). The data was collected in 2004 through the Health Care Access Panel (HCAP), a nationally generalizable survey of German households. A pronounced gender difference in FOBT use emerged. Women reported regular use more often, while men reported irregular use with a higher frequency. Nearly every third men (29.6%), compared to 17.5% of the women had never made use of FOBT. The influence of socioeconomic factors on FOBT uptake was negligible. Family history of cancer was significantly associated with FOBT but the effect was very small. Use of medical checkups and physician recommendation were the most important predictors of FOBT use in men and women. Gender differences in use of medical checkups and physician recommendation to undergo an examination for the early detection of cancer partly mediated the gender differences in FOBT use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18368645     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  7 in total

1.  Intestinal cancer despite screening: negative experience from Leipzig.

Authors:  Lutz Altenhofen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Stefan Groth; Horst Krause; Rainer Behrendt; Helge Hill; Michael Börner; Murat Bastürk; Nora Plathner; Friedrich Schütte; Ulrich Gauger; Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann; Lutz Altenhofen; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Religion and cancer prevention: study protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König; Linéa Brandt; André Hajek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Religious Denomination, Religiosity, Religious Attendance, and Cancer Prevention. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König; Linéa Brandt; Helene Rabea Weiss; André Hajek
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-01-16

5.  The influence of social determinants on the use of prevention and health promotion services: Results of a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christian Janßen; Stefanie Sauter; Christoph Kowalski
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2012-10-25

6.  Religious Attendance and Cancer Screening Behavior.

Authors:  Benedikt Kretzler; Hans-Helmut König; André Hajek
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Gender differences in self-reported family history of cancer: A review and secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Monika Sieverding; Anna Lisa Arbogast; Stephanie Zintel; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.