AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The commercially available Neuropad test was developed as a simple visual indicator test to evaluate diabetic neuropathy. It uses a colour change to define the integrity of skin sympathetic cholinergic innervation. We compared the results of Neuropad assessment in the foot with established measures of somatic and autonomic neuropathy. METHODS: Fifty-seven diabetic patients underwent Neuropad assessment, quantitative sensory and autonomic function testing, and evaluation of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in foot skin biopsies. RESULTS: Neuropad responses correlated with the neuropathy disability score (r(s)=0.450, p<0.001), neuropathic symptom score (r(s)=0.288, p=0.03), cold detection threshold (r(s)=0.394, p = 0.003), heat-as-pain perception threshold visual analogue score 0.5 (r(s)=0.279, p=0.043) and deep-breathing heart rate variability (r(s)= -0.525, p<0.001). Intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (fibres/mm) compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects (11.06+/-0.82) was non-significantly reduced (7.37+/-0.93) in diabetic patients with a normal Neuropad response and significantly reduced in patients with a patchy (5.01+/-0.93) or absent (5.02+/-0.77) response (p=0.02). The sensitivity of an abnormal Neuropad response in detecting clinical neuropathy (neuropathy disability score >or=5) was 85% (negative predictive value 71%) and the specificity was 45% (positive predictive value 69%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The Neuropad test may be a simple indicator for screening patients with diabetic neuropathy.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The commercially available Neuropad test was developed as a simple visual indicator test to evaluate diabetic neuropathy. It uses a colour change to define the integrity of skin sympathetic cholinergic innervation. We compared the results of Neuropad assessment in the foot with established measures of somatic and autonomic neuropathy. METHODS: Fifty-seven diabeticpatients underwent Neuropad assessment, quantitative sensory and autonomic function testing, and evaluation of intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in foot skin biopsies. RESULTS: Neuropad responses correlated with the neuropathy disability score (r(s)=0.450, p<0.001), neuropathic symptom score (r(s)=0.288, p=0.03), cold detection threshold (r(s)=0.394, p = 0.003), heat-as-pain perception threshold visual analogue score 0.5 (r(s)=0.279, p=0.043) and deep-breathing heart rate variability (r(s)= -0.525, p<0.001). Intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (fibres/mm) compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects (11.06+/-0.82) was non-significantly reduced (7.37+/-0.93) in diabeticpatients with a normal Neuropad response and significantly reduced in patients with a patchy (5.01+/-0.93) or absent (5.02+/-0.77) response (p=0.02). The sensitivity of an abnormal Neuropad response in detecting clinical neuropathy (neuropathy disability score >or=5) was 85% (negative predictive value 71%) and the specificity was 45% (positive predictive value 69%). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: The Neuropad test may be a simple indicator for screening patients with diabetic neuropathy.
Authors: N Papanas; K Papatheodorou; D Christakidis; D Papazoglou; G Giassakis; H Piperidou; C Monastiriotis; E Maltezos Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: C A Abbott; A L Carrington; H Ashe; S Bath; L C Every; J Griffiths; A W Hann; A Hussein; N Jackson; K E Johnson; C H Ryder; R Torkington; E R E Van Ross; A M Whalley; P Widdows; S Williamson; A J M Boulton Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: N Papanas; G Giassakis; K Papatheodorou; D Papazoglou; C Monastiriotis; D Christakidis; H Piperidou; E Maltezos Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: Nicholas Tentolouris; Christina Voulgari; Stavros Liatis; Alexander Kokkinos; Ioanna Eleftheriadou; Konstantinos Makrilakis; Kyriakoula Marinou; Nicholas Katsilambros Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-02-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: G Ponirakis; I N Petropoulos; H Fadavi; U Alam; O Asghar; A Marshall; M Tavakoli; R A Malik Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 4.359