Literature DB >> 18367097

Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on prostate cancer recurrence.

Beneranda S Ford1, Satish Sharma, Hamed Rezaishiraz, Robert S Huben, James L Mohler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transfusion may predispose patients to an increased risk of tumor recurrence following solid organ surgery. Lung and colon cancer studies suggest that blood transfusions promote tumor growth or distant metastasis possibly due to immunosuppression. Blood loss can be high during radical retropubic prostatectomy necessitating intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion. The impact of blood transfusion on recurrence risk after radical retropubic prostatectomy remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of allogeneic or autologous blood transfusion on prostate cancer recurrence in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy and assess their prognostic significance using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an intermediate endpoint.
METHODS: Six hundred eleven men treated from 1987 to the present have had all clinical and follow-up data entered prospectively into a clinical database; 242 (40%) did not receive blood transfusion, 252 (41%) received autologous blood transfusion, and 117 (19%) received allogeneic blood transfusion. Biochemical failure was defined as PSA > 0.3 ng/ml on any follow-up visit. ANOVA, chi-square, and survival analyses were used to evaluate clinical characteristics and biochemical progression-free survival.
RESULTS: Patients participated for a mean of 44 months, range 1 to 170 months, until biochemical progression (78) or July 1, 2005 (533). Average estimated blood loss was 929 ml, 1573 ml, and 2,818 ml in the no blood transfusion, autologous blood transfusion, and allogeneic blood transfusion groups, respectively (P = 0.001). Patients in the allogeneic transfusion group were older, had higher preoperative PSA, higher stage disease, and greater blood loss. Biochemical failure rates were similar in the 3 groups (P = 0.42). Biochemical failure at 5 years occurred in 14% of men who did not receive blood transfusion, 10% of men who received autologous blood transfusion, and 16% of men who received allogeneic blood transfusion. No patient suffered clinical progression or prostate cancer death.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous or allogeneic blood transfusions do not appear to influence the risk of biochemical failure in men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18367097     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  11 in total

1.  No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Boehm; B Beyer; P Tennstedt; J Schiffmann; L Budaeus; A Haese; M Graefen; T Schlomm; H Heinzer; G Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Allogeneic versus autologous blood transfusion and survival after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Heather J Chalfin; Steven M Frank; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Charles G Drake; Alan W Partin; Elizabeth Humphreys; Paul M Ness; Byong C Jeong; Seung B Lee; Misop Han
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  HLA-DQB1*03 genotype and perioperative blood transfusion are not conducive to the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shen-Kang Zhou; Lei-Lei Yang; Rui Chen; Yong Lu; Yong-Hua Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  The relationship between perioperative blood transfusion and overall mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Morgan; Daniel A Barocas; Sam S Chang; Sharon E Phillips; Shady Salem; Peter E Clark; David F Penson; Joseph A Smith; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Are we ready for the use of intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery?

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Qasim Ahmed; Victor K M Lee; Aye Sandar Zaw; Raymond Goy; Hee Kit Wong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Intraoperative cell salvage in metastatic spine tumour surgery reduces potential for reinfusion of viable cancer cells.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Aye Sandar Zaw; Bee Luan Khoo; Sayantani Nandi; Zhangxing Lai; Gurpal Singh; Chwee Teck Lim; Jean Paul Thiery
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions.

Authors:  J P Cata; H Wang; V Gottumukkala; J Reuben; D I Sessler
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Perioperative Blood Transfusion as a Significant Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence and Survival after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hyung Suk Kim; Juhyun Park; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyun Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Association between Allogeneic or Autologous Blood Transfusion and Survival in Patients after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Su-Liang Li; Yun Ye; Xiao-Hua Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Current Status of the Use of Salvaged Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumour Surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Nivetha Ravikumar; Joel Yong Hao Tan; Kutbuddin Akbary; Ravish Shammi Patel; Rajesh Kannan
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.