| Literature DB >> 18366761 |
Eva Simon1, Martin Schwarz, Judith Roos, Nico Dragano, Max Geraedts, Johannes Siegrist, Gudrun Kamp, Udo Wendel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Normal intellectual and personal development can be expected in early-diagnosed and treated PKU patients. Aim of the study was to analyse quality of life and social status, which are important parameters for an overall estimation of success of treatment apart from intellectual outcome in adult PKU patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18366761 PMCID: PMC2329607 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes ISSN: 1477-7525 Impact factor: 3.186
Theoretical dimensions and factorial structure of the PLC (Siegrist et al 1996)
| Capacity of Performance | Well-being | |
| Physical | I. Physical functioning | Listing of Symptoms |
| (Performance capacity) | ||
| 8 items | ||
| Psychological | II. Psychological Functioning | III. Positive Mood (5 items) |
| (Capacity of enjoying and relaxing) | IV. Negative Mood (8 items) | |
| (8 Items) | ||
| Social | V. Social Functioning | VI. Social Well-being |
| (Capacity of performing in social roles) | (Feelings of belonging) | |
| (6 items) | (5 items) |
Comparison of mean QoL measured with the Profile of Quality of Life in the Chronically Ill (PLC) in PKU patients with the German norm; Mean and Standard Deviation
| Patient collective 17–38 years Mean (SD) | Normal collective 18–34 years Mean (SD) | Significance | |
| Physical functioning | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.8 (0.6) | n.s. |
| Psychological Functioning | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.7 (0.6) | n.s. |
| Positive Mood | 2.7 (0.8) | 2.5 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Negative Mood | 3.2 (0.6) | 3.0 (0.8) | n.s. |
| Social Functioning | 2.9 (0.9) | 2.7 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Social Well-being | 3.1 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Number of symptoms | 1.0 (0.9) | - |
Comparison of mean QoL in patients under and above 25 years; Mean and Standard Deviation
| Patient collective 17–25 years Mean (SD) | Patient collective 25–37 years Mean (SD) | Significance | |
| Physical functioning | 3.0 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.4) | n.s. |
| Psychological Functioning | 2.8 (0.8) | 2.8 (0.5) | n.s. |
| Positive Mood | 2.6 (0.9) | 2.8 (0.6) | n.s. |
| Negative Mood | 3.1 (0.6) | 3.3 (0.4) | n.s. |
| Social Functioning | 3.0 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Social Well-being | 3.0 (0.8) | 3.1 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Number of symptoms | 0.8 (0.9) | 1.2 (1.0) | n.s. |
Comparison of mean QoL in male and female patients; Mean and Standard Deviation
| Patient collective Female Mean (SD) | Patient collective Male Mean (SD) | Significance | |
| Physical functioning | 2.9 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.5) | n.s. |
| Psychological Functioning | 2.7 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.6) | (p = 0.09) |
| Positive Mood | 2.5 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.6) | (p = 0.02) |
| Negative Mood | 3.1 (0.6) | 3.3 (0.5) | n.s. |
| Social Functioning | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.7) | n.s. |
| Social Well-being | 3.2 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.7) | (p = 0.09) |
Range of scales: 0–4; low values = low quality of life, high value = high quality of life, SD, standard deviation; n.s., not significant
Sociodemographic data: Marital state, children, habitation
| Both sexes | Male | Female | ||||
| Patient collective | Normal collective | Patient collective | Normal collective | Patient collective | Normal collective | |
| Marital state | ||||||
| Unmarried | 82% | 55% | 83% | 61% | 82% | 49% |
| Steady relationship | 33% | n.a. | 22% | n.a. | 39% | n.a. |
| No steady relationship | 67% | n.a. | 78% | n.a. | 61% | n.a. |
| Married | 15% | 42% | 13% | 37% | 16% | 47% |
| Divorced | 3% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 4% |
| Children | 12% | 47% | 18% | 33% | 9% | 51% |
| Type of habitation | ||||||
| Single household | 18% | 23,1% | 30% | 27% | 11% | 20% |
| Parents | 46% | 24,6% | 48% | 26% | 46% | 24% |
| Non-relative (shared flat) | 3% | n.a. | 4% | n.a. | 2% | n.a. |
| Marital or a illegitimate partner | 31% | n.a. | 17% | n.a. | 39% | n.a. |
| Others | 2% | n.a. | 0% | n.a. | 2% | n.a. |
n.a., data not available from the German census
School education and professional training
| Both sexes | Male | Female | ||||
| Patient collective | Normal collective | Patient collective | Normal collective | Patient collective | Normal collective | |
| Highest school leaving certificate | ||||||
| Secondary school leaving certificate | 22% | 26% | 35% | 30% | 16% | 23% |
| Intermediate school leaving certificate | 29% | 26% | 13% | 23% | 36% | 29% |
| Entrance qualification for university | 33% | 33% | 39% | 33% | 30% | 34% |
| Others/no information | 16% | 14% | 13% | 14% | 18% | 14% |
| Persons still in professional training | 43% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 48% | 23% |
| Of these: | ||||||
| School of general education | 35% | 26% | 25% | 24% | 38% | 28% |
| Apprenticeship | 35% | 49% | 25% | 50% | 38% | 47% |
| University student | 29% | 24% | 50% | 24% | 19% | 24% |
| Others/no information | 3% | 1% | - | - | 5% | - |
| Highest professional qualification | ||||||
| No professional training finished | 48% | 36% | 25% | 35% | 55% | 37% |
| Apprenticeship | 43% | 44% | 52% | 43% | 39% | 45% |
| Master craftsman/technician | 2% | 5% | - | 6% | 2% | 4% |
| University degree | 8% | 9% | 13% | 10% | 5% | 9% |
| Others/no information | - | 5% | - | 6% | - | 5% |
| Labour force | 73% | 75% | 74% | 84% | 73% | 66% |
| Of these: | ||||||
| Unemployed | 8% | 11% | 6% | 12% | 9% | 9% |
| Part-time employed | 22% | 18% | 24% | 6% | 22% | 32% |
| Full-time employed | 69% | 72% | 71% | 82% | 69% | 59% |