Literature DB >> 18366124

Toward a common understanding of self-assessment.

Joan Sargeant1.   

Abstract

Self-assessment and its role in self-regulation and lifelong learning lack clarity. A goal of this Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions issue is to begin to clarify our current understanding of self-assessment and what it entails, as seen through an educational lens. The purpose of this summary article is to synthesize briefly the definitions of self-assessment proposed by the authors, their perspectives on external and internal factors influencing and/or inherent in self-assessment, and common messages for educational research and practice. Among the seven authors, there appears to be unanimity in conceptualizing self-assessment within a formative, educational perspective, and seeing it as an activity that draws upon both external and internal data, standards, and resources to inform and make decisions about one's performance. Multiple external sources can and should inform self-assessment, perhaps most important among them performance standards, eg, clinical practice guidelines, and use of formal practice audit and feedback approaches. Equally important, internal factors or capacities also influence one's ability to self-assess and self-monitor, such as reflection, mindfulness, openness, curiosity. In summary, these articles aid in our appreciation of the complexity of self-assessment as a formative activity and identify multiple implications for educational practice and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366124     DOI: 10.1002/chp.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  6 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine training in a resource-poor country, the importance of leveraging personal and institutional relationships.

Authors:  Cristina Tomatis; Claudia Taramona; Emiliana Rizo-Patrón; Fiorela Hernández; Patricia Rodríguez; Alejandro Piscoya; Elsa Gonzales; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Gustavo Heudebert; Robert M Centor; Carlos A Estrada
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments.

Authors:  M J Tweed; S Stein; T J Wilkinson; G Purdie; J Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  The role of organization of care in GPs' prevention practice.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Delpech; Lorraine Poncet; Arnaud Gautier; Henri Panjo; Rissane Ourabah; Pascaline Mourey; Mathilde Baumhauer; Isabelle Pendola-Luchel; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.458

4.  How do postgraduate GP trainees regulate their learning and what helps and hinders them? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Margaretha H Sagasser; Anneke W M Kramer; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Comparison of expectations and beliefs about good teaching in an academic day release medical education program: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Thea A C M van Roermund; Henk G Mokkink; Ben J A M Bottema; Chris van Weel; Albert J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Impact of structured verbal feedback module in medical education: A questionnaire- and test score-based analysis.

Authors:  Meenakshi Aggarwal; Sonia Singh; Anu Sharma; Poonam Singh; Priya Bansal
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.