Literature DB >> 18366025

Simultaneously detection of genomic and expression alterations in prostate cancer using cDNA microarray.

Mei Jiang1, Ming Li, Xuping Fu, Yan Huang, Hui Qian, Ruping Sun, Yumin Mao, Yi Xie, Yao Li.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a common disease among men but the knowledge of the prostate carcinogenesis is still limited.
METHODS: cDNA microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and expression profiling were performed to screen the genomic and the expression changes in prostate cancer respectively. The two data were integrated to study the influence of genomic aberrations on gene expression and seek for the genes with their expression affected by the genomic aberrations. Real-time PCR was performed to evaluate the array data.
RESULTS: Array-based CGH detected gains at 2q, 3p/q, 5q, 6q, 8q, 9p, 10p/q, 11q, 12p, 14q, and 19p/q and losses at 1p, 2p, 4q, 6p/q, 7p, 11p/q, 12q, 17p/q, 19p/q, and Xp/q in more than 20% prostate tumors and narrowed these aberrations. For example, the gain of 8q was mapped to five minimal regions. Novel aberrations were also identified, such as loss at Xq21.33-q22.2. Expression profiling discovered the significant biological processes involved in the prostate carcinogenesis, such as exogenous antigen presentation via MHC class II and protein ubiquitination. Integration analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between genomic copy number and gene expression level. Fifty-three genes showed their expression directly affected by the genomic aberrations possibly, including more than one member of Ras superfamily and major histocompatibility complex (MHC). These genes are involved in multiple biological processes.
CONCLUSIONS: Integration of the CGH and expression data provided more information than separate analysis. Although the direct influence of genomic aberrations on gene expression seems weak, the influence can be extended by indirect regulation through a few directly affected genes. Because the influence can be persistent, the genes directly affected by the genomic aberrations may play key roles in the prostate carcinogenesis and are worth further analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18366025     DOI: 10.1002/pros.20756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  13 in total

1.  Construction and phenotypic analysis of mice carrying a duplication of the major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) locus.

Authors:  Olga Ermakova; Ekaterina Salimova; Lukasz Piszczek; Cornelius Gross
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Genetic heterogeneity in Finnish hereditary prostate cancer using ordered subset analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Simpson; Cheryl D Cropp; Tiina Wahlfors; Asha George; Marypat S Jones; Ursula Harper; Damaris Ponciano-Jackson; Teuvo Tammela; Johanna Schleutker; Joan E Bailey-Wilson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Establishment of a Genomic-Clinicopathologic Nomogram for Predicting Early Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After R0 Resection.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Han Liang; Qifa Ye; Yanfeng Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Copy number and gene expression differences between African American and Caucasian American prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amy E Rose; Jaya M Satagopan; Carole Oddoux; Qin Zhou; Ruliang Xu; Adam B Olshen; Jessie Z Yu; Atreya Dash; Jerome Jean-Gilles; Victor Reuter; William L Gerald; Peng Lee; Iman Osman
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Cytogenetic and cDNA microarray expression analysis of MCF10 human breast cancer progression cell lines.

Authors:  Narasimharao V Marella; Kishore S Malyavantham; Jianmin Wang; Sei-ichi Matsui; Ping Liang; Ronald Berezney
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Genomic profiling of prostate cancers from African American men.

Authors:  Patricia Castro; Chad J Creighton; Mustafa Ozen; Dror Berel; Martha P Mims; Michael Ittmann
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Association of chromosome 8q variants with prostate cancer risk in Caucasian and Hispanic men.

Authors:  Joke Beuten; Jonathan A L Gelfond; Margarita L Martinez-Fierro; Korri S Weldon; AnaLisa C Crandall; Augusto Rojas-Martinez; Ian M Thompson; Robin J Leach
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Patient-specific data fusion defines prognostic cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Yinyin Yuan; Richard S Savage; Florian Markowetz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Epithelial to mesenchymal transition of a primary prostate cell line with switches of cell adhesion modules but without malignant transformation.

Authors:  Xi-Song Ke; Yi Qu; Naomi Goldfinger; Kari Rostad; Randi Hovland; Lars A Akslen; Varda Rotter; Anne Margrete Øyan; Karl-Henning Kalland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Global gene expression analysis reveals reduced abundance of putative microRNA targets in human prostate tumours.

Authors:  Ruping Sun; Xuping Fu; Yao Li; Yi Xie; Yumin Mao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.